Tag Archives: emma kenney

Music and the Brain

Emma Kenney

Music has been an important part of society for centuries. From the earliest human civilizations to today, music has been used to express emotion and keep record of both historical events and the way of life of a certain people or era. It is hard to deny music has an impact on human culture, but what impact does music have on the human brain?

Research conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology answers the long posed question, “Does music impact its own section of the brain, or does it simply affect the portion of the brain involving speaking and responding to the speech of others?” Their studies shows while music causes multiple areas to react, it specifically causes one to react only associated with music, not with speech or other sounds within one’s environment. A report written by Anne Trafton on the matter explains:

The finding was enabled by a new method designed to identify neural populations from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Using this method, the researchers identified six neural populations with different functions, including the music-selective population and another set of neurons that responds selectively to speech.

“The music result is notable because people had not been able to clearly see highly selective responses to music before,” says Sam Norman-Haignere, a postdoc at MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research.

“Our findings are hard to reconcile with the idea that music piggybacks entirely on neural machinery that is optimized for other functions, because the neural responses we see are highly specific to music,” says Nancy Kanwisher, the Walter A. Rosenblith Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at MIT and a member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research.

According to an article published by the National Institute of Health, music can actually provide relief to those in physical pain: “Several well-controlled studies have found that listening to music can alleviate pain or reduce the need for pain medications. Other research suggests that music can benefit heart disease patients by reducing their blood pressure, heart rate and anxiety.” This can be partially linked to the calming effect music is able to produce.

This can be seen when you examine students who listen to classical music before tests. Studies have shown this specific type of music causes the brain to release neurons that encourage the human body to relax and the mind to combat anxiety and stress. Professional bassoon player Lawrence O’Donnell wrote an essay explaining the effects of this. His essay also describes how music is tied to recall. Students who listened to the same genre of music while studying and taking a test received higher marks than those who listened to one genre of music while studying and a different genre while taking the test. He goes on to explain this is tied mainly to the impact of music tempo, not to the style of music itself. O’Donnell states:

One simple way students can improve test scores is by listening to certain types of music such as Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major before taking a test. This type of music releases neurons in the brain which help the body to relax. The effectiveness of Mozart’s sonatas can be seen by the results from an IQ test performed on three groups of college students. The first group listened to a Mozart sonata before taking the test. The second group listened to a relaxation tape before their test. The third group did not listen to anything before the test. The first group had the highest score with an average of 119.

The second group ended up with an average of 111, and the third group had the lowest score with an average of 110.

William Balach, Kelly Bowman, and Lauri Mohler, all from Pennsylvania State University, studied the effects of music genre and tempo on memory retention. They had four groups learn vocabulary words using one of four instrumental pieces — slow classical, slow jazz, fast classical, and fast jazz. Each of the four groups was divided into smaller groups for the recall test. These sub groups used either the same (i.e., slow classical, slow classical) or different (i.e., slow jazz, fast classical) pieces when taking the recall test. The results did show a dependency on the music. Recall was better when the music was the same during learning and testing. These same researchers did another test which [sic] restricted the changes in the music to just tempo (i.e., slow to fast jazz) or just genre (i.e., slow jazz to slow classical). Surprisingly, the results showed that changing the genre had no effect on recall but changing the tempo decreased recall.

The effects of music on the brain as a whole become increasingly more complex and impressive when you take a closer look at how it works. It is common knowledge that when music, like sound, enters the brain it is processed by certain nerves; however, it is only recently we have stated to see how that process works for music specifically. The National Institute of Health states:

Scientists have long known that when music and other sounds enter the ear, they’re converted to electrical signals. The signals travel up the auditory nerve to the brain’s auditory cortex, which processes sound. From there, the brain’s responses to music become much more complex.

Over the past decade, new brain imaging techniques have shown that music activates many unexpected brain regions. It can turn on areas involved in emotion and memory. It can also activate the brain’s motor regions, which prepare for and coordinate physical movement.

Studies conducted by Dr. Petr Janata, a neuroscientist from the University of California Davis, show music especially has an impact on a portion of the brain called the medial prefrontal cortex. This portion of the brain has a role in both decision making and retaining memories. Dr. Janata used a process called functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, to examine the brain activity of certain individuals when they listened to music. Dr. Janata’s studies essentially showed the medial prefrontal cortex is capable of linking familiar music to the memories of an individual, especially those the individual finds important. In Dr. Janata’s words:

Dorsal regions of the MPFC (Brodmann area 8/9) were shown to respond parametrically to the degree of autobiographical salience experienced over the course of individual 30 s excerpts. Moreover, the dorsal MPFC also responded on a second, faster timescale corresponding to the signature movements of the musical excerpts through tonal space. These results suggest that the dorsal MPFC associates music and memories when we experience emotionally salient episodic memories that are triggered by familiar songs from our personal past. MPFC acted in concert with lateral prefrontal and posterior cortices both in terms of tonality tracking and overall responsiveness to familiar and autobiographically salient songs.

The effects of music on the medial prefrontal cortex can explain why those with Alzheimer’s are able to recognize music from their past even after other memories have been lost. Dr. Janata’s studies have shown this portion of the brain is one of the last to deteriorate, meaning the memories associated with this region, those revolving around music, will remain even after others have been forgotten.

Music has an even greater impact on the brains of those who play instruments. Dr. Gottfried Schlaug conducted research with Dr. Christian Gaser that shows the brains of professional musicians not only have thicker bundles of nerves connecting the right and left sides but have more grey matter as well. This is significant when one takes into account that the grey matter of the brain is responsible for muscle control and sensory perception; that is, it is responsible for functions such as self-control, speech, and decision making. Dr. Schlaug states:

In comparing these three groups (professional musicians, amateur musicians, and non-musicians), areas with a significant positive correlation between musician status and increase in gray matter volume were found in perirolandic regions including primary motor and somatosensory areas, premotor areas, anterior superior parietal areas, and in the inferior temporal gyrus bilaterally. A positive correlation means that the gray matter volume is highest in professional musicians, intermediate in amateur musicians, and lowest in non-musicians.

Dr. Schlaug has also researched whether music has an effect on the brains of children. His studies show music has as much of an effect on children as it does on adults. Children who took 15 months of music lessons experienced changes to the portion of the brain responsible for motor control and human rhythm. This tie between music and the brain could be key to improving the motor skills of those with conditions relating to a loss of movement. The children who took music lessons also had a greater ability to execute and control finger movement and multi-task. Dr. Schlaug states:

As part of an ongoing longitudinal study of the effects of music training on brain, behavioral, and cognitive development in young children — here we investigated structural brain changes in relation to behavioral changes in young children who received 15 months of instrumental musical training relative to a group of children who did not…. As predicted, Instrumental children showed greater behavioral improvements over the 15 months on the finger motor task and the melody/rhythmic tasks, but not on the nonmusical tasks. In addition, Instrumental children showed areas of greater relative voxel size change over the 15 months as compared to Controls in motor brain areas, such as the right precentral gyrus (motor hand area), and the corpus callosum (4th and 5th segment/midbody), as well as in a right primary auditory region (Heschl’s gyrus). These brain deformation differences are consistent with structural brain differences found between adult musicians and non-musicians in the precentral gyri, the corpus callosum, and auditory cortex…. These results are important from a functional perspective since these brain regions are known to be of critical importance in instrumental music performance and auditory processing. For example, the primary motor area plays a critical role in motor planning, execution, and control of bimanual sequential finger movements as well as motor learning.

A similar study was conducted by the Journal of Neuroscience. Their research shows on top of helping children with motor skills, playing an instrument can actually help improve a child’s ability to process information. This study followed at risk children as they participated in a music program. The behavior of these children improved greatly as they continued to be allowed to play music. This music program, called the Harmony Project, partnered with Dr. Nina Kraus to study the effects of music on the brains of the kids and whether learning an instrument actually helped with the ability to process and therefor understand human speech.

An NPR article written by Cory Turner describes the experiment of the two as follows:

Harmony Project is the brainchild of Margaret Martin, whose life path includes parenting two kids while homeless before earning a doctorate in public health. A few years ago, she noticed something remarkable about the kids who had gone through her program.

In other research, Kraus had noticed something about the brains of kids who come from poverty, like many in the Harmony Project. These children often hear fewer words by age 5 than other kids do.

“And that’s a problem,” Kraus says, because “in the absence of stimulation, the nervous system … hungry for stimulation … will make things up. So, in the absence of sound, what we saw is that there was just more random background activity, which you might think of as static.”

In addition to that “neural noise,” as Kraus calls it, ability to process sound — like telling the difference between someone saying ba and ga — requires microsecond precision in the brain. And many kids raised in poverty, Kraus says, simply have a harder time doing it; individual sounds can seem “blurry” to the brain.

Working with Harmony Project, Kraus randomly assigned several dozen kids from the program’s waitlist into two groups: those who would be studied after one year of music lessons and those who would be studied after two years.

And what she found was that in the two-year kids, the static didn’t go away. But their brains got better — more precise — at processing sound. In short: less blur.

It goes back to pitch, timing and timbre. Kraus argues that learning music improves the brain’s ability to process all three, which helps kids pick up language, too. Consonants and vowels become clearer, and the brain can make sense of them more quickly.

Studies conducted by John Hopkins Medicine show listening to music or playing an instrument has the same effect on the brain as working out has on the body. It can be extremely useful in delaying the aging process of the brain. JHM states:

If you want to firm up your body, head to the gym. If you want to exercise your brain, listen to music.

“There are few things that stimulate the brain the way music does,” says one Johns Hopkins otolaryngologist. “If you want to keep your brain engaged throughout the aging process, listening to or playing music is a great tool. It provides a total brain workout.”

“Music is structural, mathematical and architectural. It’s based on relationships between one note and the next. You may not be aware of it, but your brain has to do a lot of computing to make sense of it,” notes one otolaryngologist.

Listen to what your kids or grandkids listen to, experts suggest. Often we continue to listen to the same songs and genre of music that we did during our teens and 20s, and we generally avoid hearing anything that’s not from that era.

New music challenges the brain in a way that old music doesn’t. It might not feel pleasurable at first, but that unfamiliarity forces the brain to struggle to understand the new sound.

It is easy to see music has a large impact on the brain. It helps with things ranging from muscle control to memory retention to improved speech and self control. As scientists continue to make new discoveries involving music and the brain, we might one day unlock a whole new way of life revolving around the vast effects of music on the human brain.

Bibliography

Euston, David R., Aaron J. Gruber, and Bruce L. McNaughton. “The Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Memory and Decision Making.” Neuron. Cell, 20 Dec. 2012. Web. 1 Sept. 2016.

Gaser, Christian, and Gottfried Schlaug. “Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians.” JNeurosci. Society for Neuroscience, 08 Oct. 2003. Web. 1 Sept. 2016.

Hyde, Krista L., Jason Lerch, Andrea Norton, Marie Forgeard, Ellen Winner, Alan C. Evans, and Gottfried Schlaug. “The Effects of Musical Training on Structural Brain Development.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169.1 (2009): 182-86. Web.

National Institute of Health. “Music Matters for Body and Mind — News in Health, January 2010.” U.S National Library of Medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 01 Sept. 2016.

O’Donnell, Laurence. “Music and the Brain.” Music and the Brain. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Sept. 2016.

Petr Janata. “The Neural Architecture of Music-Evoked Autobiographical Memories.” Oxford Journals. Oxford, 24 Feb. 2009. Web. 01 Sept. 2016.

Robertson, Sally. “What Is Grey Matter?” News-Medical.net. N.p., 01 Nov. 2010. Web. 01 Sept. 2016.

Trafton, Anne. “Music in the Brain.” MIT News. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 16 Dec. 2015. Web. 01 Sept. 2016.

The World Without Religion

Emma Kenney

There is a constant battle between the ideology belonging to atheists and that belonging to Christians. Author Robin Daverman states:

Religion may have accounted for a lot of wars in the Middle Ages, but in the 20th century, the biggest source of human disasters is actually pseudo-science. The biggest military disaster is WWII, which was triggered by Nazi ideology. The Nazi ideology borrowed heavily from Darwin’s “natural selection” and the nascent environmentalism. There were films made about “superior race” eugenics, and how those who were born less than perfect should just go kill himself. The whole “lebensraum” (German for “Habitat”) was about environmental carrying capacity — for humans. Total fatality from WWII ranges from 50 million to 80 million.

Why then do so many people say that the world would be better off without religion, specifically Christianity?

Many people think being an atheist leaves you with no connection to religion, but that is inaccurate. Author and director of the Henry Jackson Society, Douglas Murray states, “atheists tend to imply that there isn’t much work to do after discarding God. On the contrary, after discarding God, all the work of establishing morals is still before you — just as after demonstrating mankind’s need for ethics, the work of proving a particular religion is true remains before you.”

A question long pondered is “where do morals even come from?” According to Friedrich Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals, morals come from the clash of opposing social strata. However, how is it society can have long standing concrete morals if the clashes of society are always changing? In theory, shouldn’t that produce vastly changing morals instead of ones that stand concrete? That is not to say everyone agrees with or even acknowledges the same morals. There will always be a dispute over morals, but that comes from humanity’s sin nature and their inward desire to do only what is beneficial to them.

If humanity does indeed have concrete and never-ending morals it would involve a Divine being having placed them within the framework of each individual human themselves. It is simply just not something humanity can claim to have done. This therefore means morals come from religion, so by default, if you took away the religion you would be taking away the sense of morals. Man is simply too sinful to claim he (or she) is capable of always being morally upright just because he feels like it. There will always be the desire to and the act of sin within every human that is and ever will be.

Religion has also contributed greatly to charity within society, leading many organizations and fighting for many rights. Author Jonathan Sarfati says:

Christianity has been at the forefront of other humanitarian causes, such as literacy, hospitals, orphanages and abolition of child labour. The biblical teaching that all humans come from “one man/blood” (Acts 17:26) is the best antidote to racism, and science is catching up. It’s notable that Wilberforce was also an advocate of animal welfare. (Beware the confusion of animal welfare with animal rights. The former seeks to treat animals humanely, while the latter purports to give animals, e.g. the great apes, the same rights as humans.)

Even today, conservative Christians still give far more support to charities than do other people, as noted by a recent book, Who Really Cares, by Prof. Arthur Brooks. The data were a total surprise to Brooks, who had a socially liberal background. It showed that:

“Religious Americans are more likely to give to every kind of cause and charity, including explicitly nonreligious charities. Religious people give more blood; religious people give more to homeless people on the street.”

Christianity has also contributed to the scientific world as well, contrary to popular belief. In fact, Christian science is significant enough to even be considered by some as the beginning of all other sciences. Without it, the modern science of today might not be the same. Sarfati states:

Science is another area where the conventional wisdom puts it at loggerheads with Christianity. However, historians of science have pointed out that modern science first flourished under a Christian worldview while it was stillborn in other cultures. This is due mainly to two biblical teachings: (1) man had dominion over creation (Genesis 1:26–28), so had a duty to investigate it without praying to the “water spirit” or “forest god” or the like. (2) God is a lawgiving God of order, not confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33). So the early scientists had faith that God’s upholding of His creation in an orderly way could be described in terms of “natural laws.”

Author Alex Williams talks about Christian scientists in the medieval era, bringing up the fact many of the scientists whose theories we still acknowledge today were in fact Christians. He says the following:

Alchemy and astrology were highly developed in China, Islamic regions, India and ancient Greece and Rome, but only in medieval Europe did these become the sciences of chemistry and astronomy. “It is the consensus among contemporary historians, philosophers and sociologists of science that real science arose only once: in Europe.” The leading scientific figures in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were overwhelmingly devout Christians who believed it their duty to comprehend God’s handiwork.

Science began in the Christian universities under the influence of the devout scholastics. Copernicus was described by the infamous A.D. White as “a simple minded scholar” who “discovered” that the Earth revolves around the sun. More fudging. Copernicus was an eminent Christian scholar who studied at the Christian universities of Cracow, Bologna, Padua and Ferrera. He was taught the fundamentals of celestial mechanics that led to his heliocentric model. A long series of scholastic developments, including the demolition of Aristotle’s view of mechanics, made way for the modern version (via “impetus theory”), and it was biblical reasoning that guided the process.

But what was the Christian difference? India, China, Persia, Greece and Rome all had venerable traditions of scholarship but why did only Christian Europe develop science? Stark’s answer is simple but profound — the Christian God was rational, responsive, dependable and omnipotent and the universe was his personal creation in which his divine nature was put on display for man’s benefit and instruction. Among the passages most commonly cited by medieval scholars was: “Thou has ordered all things in measure and number and weight.” Christians believed that science could be done and should be done.

A world without religion would have serious consequences. It is best put by Sarfati, who says the following:

It is no accident that the greatest mass murderers in history were the atheistic communists like Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot; and the thoroughly evolutionized Nazi Germany. It has also been noted that when people cease believing in the true God, they don’t believe in nothing, but believe in anything. So it is not surprising that absurd God-substitutes abound.

It is evident a world without Christianity would not be a pleasant place, but would instead be a place with no morals, less charity, and less science. Many principles and discoveries known today might not have been known for years upon years after they were discovered if it were not for the Christian scientists and thinkers who devoted so much time to researching the world their God made. This shows if you don’t believe in something, indeed, you will fall for anything.

Works Cited

Daverman, Robin. “Would the World Be Better If Everyone Was an Atheist?” Quora.com. N.p., 27 Jan. 2015. Web.

Murray, Douglas. “Would Human Life Be Sacred in an Atheist World?” The Spectator. N.p., 19  Apr. 2014. Web. 10 Mar. 2016.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Walter Arnold Kaufmann, and Reginald John Hollingdale. On the Genealogy of Morals; Ecce Homo; Friedrich Nietzsche. New York: Vintage, 1967. Print.

Sarfati, Jonathan. “What Good Is Christianity?” CMI Mobile. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2016.

Williams, Alex. “The Biblical Origins of Science.” CMI Mobile. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2016.

Modern Christianity: Alive or a Lie?

Emma Kenney

The modern Church and Christianity in both America and the world are skewed.  Corruption and misunderstanding are prominent, bleeding not only into Christian values but into fundamental Christian practices as well.  Christianity has strayed from what is was originally intended to be, and if Christians of years past looked upon the Christians of today, they would have trouble associating themselves with each other.  In the words of Ludwig Feuerbach: “The Christians — we mean of course the Christians of former days, who would with difficulty recognize the worldly, frivolous, pagan Christians of the modern world as their brethren in Christ….”  That proposes an important question: Is the form of Christianity originally intended by Jesus alive in today’s world, or is modern Christianity simply a pretty lie?

Whether modern Christians admit it or not, Christianity is and always has been, a religion of suffering.  According to Feuerbach: “While Socrates empties the cup of poison with unshakeable soul, Christ exclaims, ‘If it be possible, let this cup pass from me.’ Christ is in this respect the self-confession of human sensibility.”

As previously stated, Christianity has always been a religion of suffering.  The suffering began with a form of the Christian deity begin ridiculed, beaten, and crucified.  This same deity then took on the punishment of the entire history of mankind in Hell and conquered it in three days.  In Luke 22:42, Jesus proclaims, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me.  Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done.”  His suffering was so great He asked it to not fall upon Him, but yet He committed to obeying God’s plan even if it meant experiencing that great suffering.

However, modern day Christians flock to Christianity in order to find a way to escape all suffering.  While there has always been knowledge in Heaven there will be no suffering, today’s Christians expect to experience that same benefit on earth instead of experiencing the pain promised to Christians.  2 Timothy 3:12 states, “Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted,” and Matthew 10:22 says, “And you will be hated by all for my name’s sake.  But the one who endures to the end will be saved.”  Modern Christians ignore these verses when assuming Christianity will give them no worldly pain.

Not only do modern day Christians flock to Christianity for a life of earthly perfection, they misuse prayer as well.  Matthew 6:9-13 says as follows: “Pray then like this: ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name.  Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.  Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.  And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.’”

There are three main components to this prayer: 1) Glorification of the Lord, 2) A request for help and forgiveness, and 3) Thanksgiving.  However, most modern Christians focus only on the second component and omit any glorification of God or expression of gratitude toward Him.  They attempt to use prayer in order to achieve their desired perfect life upon the earth.  Feuerbach says the following: “Pain must give itself utterance; involuntarily the artist seizes the lite that he may breathe out his sufferings in its tones.  He soothes his sorrow by making it audible to himself, by making it objective.  He lightens the burden which weighs upon his heart by communicating it to the air, by making his sorrow a general existence.”

This is, of course, how the Christians of today use prayer.  They utter the sorrow and suffering they are experiencing and beg the two be taken away from them, but unlike in the prayer prayed by Jesus, they don’t commit to following the will of God even if it still involved said sorrow and suffering.  Instead, their prayer is on the verge of being conditional.  Essentially they are saying, “If You take away my suffering, then I will continue to follow You, but if You do not abolish my pain, I will leave.”

Most modern Christians are quick to ask, but not so quick to give.  In the words of Feuerbach, “Prayer is the absolute relation of the human heart to itself, to its own nature; in prayer, man forgets that there exists a limit to his wishes, and is happy in this forgetfulness.”  Christians ignore the fact God is not their personal genie in a bottle, formed to grant their every wish and see to their every command.  They then become angry when God does not fit into the box of their idea and assume this means He does not care for them at all.

This has caused modern Christians to become selfish.  Each prayer answered in the way they desired makes them want another and another, even though their sole purpose of prayer is to make their lives as comfortable as possible instead of praying for the needs of the world and the people around them.  Ludwig Feuerbach declares:

“In Christianity, man was concentrated only on himself, he unlinked himself from the chain of sequences in the system of the universe, he made himself a self-sufficing whole, an absolute, extra- and supra-mundane being.  Because he no longer regarded himself as a being immanent in the world, because he severed himself from his connection with it, he felt himself an unlimited being — (for the sole limit of subjectivity it the world, is objectivity), — he had no longer any reason to doubt the truth and validity of his subjective wishes and feelings.”

Since Christians have become focused on themselves instead of the world and the people around them, it is easy for them to take on a subjective view.  Modern Christians get so caught up in their own desires they severe the bonds that connect them to this world and begin to assume they are on an entirely different level to the one on which pagans find themselves.  Essentially, this attitude of Christians has become known as the “holier-than-thou” attitude.  It compels select Christians to believe no matter how messed up they are, they are still far better than both other Christians and pagans.  They ignore the problems of anyone except for themselves and see absolutely no problem in doing so.  Hence, the subjective nature is created.

However, this is discussed in Mark 10:45.  The verse states, “For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”  If Jesus came to serve others, then how can Christians possibly justify their unwillingness to serve or even simply pray for others?  The answer is, of course, they can’t.  Philippians 2:5-7 refutes the idea it is okay to be a “holier-than-thou” Christian.  The verse says as follows: “Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.”

This makes it clear Christians are equals and have been called to serve.  Why then is it modern Christians of today are so hesitant to serve?  Their subjective view hides the illogical nature of their choices from them.  Christians so often follow the ideology because they have prayed a prayer and received forgiveness for their sins, they are somehow better and more valuable than the rest of the world.  However, this is simply not the case.  Even the most outstanding Christian is, contrary to the belief of some, not any more valuable than the rest of the world.  He has simply been forgive for the sins he has committed.  Galatians 3:28 declares, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”  This shows all are equal before God.

This truth of equality is essential.  If it was to be universally accepted, the world, let alone Christianity, would be entirely different.  Praying selfless prayers wouldn’t be something people hesitated about, and servitude would run rampant, overpowering the sense of selfishness that has gained control over the world.  If this idea of equality on the Biblical level was truly and honestly accepted, Christianity would become a force strong enough to conquer and change the entire world.

How then, can we answer the question, “Is the form of Christianity originally intended by Jesus alive in today’s world, or is modern Christianity simply a pretty lie?”  Modern Christianity is painfully different from the Christianity originally intended within the New Testament.  Christians now try to escape the will of God instead of accepting it.  Servitude has been replaced by an extreme and extensive form of selfishness, and prayer has been corrupted to the point it is nearly unrecognizable.  Until these issues have been resolved, Christianity is nothing and cannot be anything more than a beautiful lie.