Monthly Archives: October 2022

Hi! I’m a Used Bookstore

Christopher Rush

I like to put sticky-backed price tags on rare comic book covers and paperback covers and all over jewel cases of compact discs (despite the fact thieves of this generation have no desire to purloin them).  After all, why wouldn’t you, the consumer, want something as large and destructive as a sticky price tag defacing the value and diminishing your enjoyment of the product you want to own and I don’t care about?  That just doesn’t make sense.

Oh, you have five boxes of goods, rare vinyl albums, pristine books, compact discs, and digital video discs?  That’s swell.  We can give you either four dollars and eighty-six cents in cash or $117 in our special trade-in Storebucks™ (not valid on new releases, quality merchandise, Blu-ray discs, or items you’re looking for).  Don’t let the fact we will be selling one of the paperbacks in box number three for over $8 by itself bother you.  We pamper every customer with such royal treatment.

Speaking of which, you are probably wondering where the restrooms are.  Fortunately, we removed three of the bathrooms to make more room for the Harlequin Romance section expansion (the fifteen bookcases’ worth we had before, frankly, was not enough).  Thus, due to the daily frequency of customers requiring use of such facilities averaging only about five hundred and twenty per hour, we decided to limit our capacity to one sole multi-gender bathroom, enabling customers to socialize and enjoy each other’s company in meaningful, life-affirming ways while showing each generation how to wait patiently in a line.  That’s what book stores are all about, right?

On your left, you’ll see our Items We’re Really Proud Of sections, cases A through WW.  In those sections we have randomly assigned prices to various albums, books, concert videos, and miscellaneous items.  Basically, we don’t want you to buy any of those items.  Yes, you will find albums from the same band in our Items We’re Fine With You Buying sections on the right-hand side of the store, with mildly decent prices ranging for ninety-nine cents to four dollars and ninety-nine cents, but the albums by them in the Items We’re Really Proud Of sections typically cost anywhere between eight dollars and ninety-nine cents and the GDP of Uruguay.  I can’t really explain to you the thought process behind which albums get placed in which sections, but I can go ask my shift manager if you want?  He should be done playing this round of Magic: the Gathering in a little under a fortnight?  No?  Okydoky.  If you have further questions later, please feel free to contact Customer Service, conveniently located in the foothills of the Himalayas.  No phone.

Next to that is our Vinyl Collection: the ones no one wants are four dollars apiece.  The Contemporary Reprints of Classic Rock Albums You Might Want are only thirty dollars each, though there is a non-refundable cover charge of sixteen fifty if you want to browse through them.  Original Vinyl Albums are located in the Don’t Even Think You Can Afford These annex at our downtown branch.

Oh, and books by that author you are interested in are scattered higgledy-piggledy throughout the store.  The books you already have (including the ones you special ordered from the UK last week) are located in our Buy 1 Get 7 Free section awkwardly located between the Wicca shelves and the Gentlemen’s Club shelves (you can’t miss them, they’re right next to the Children’s Books and Play Area).  The two books you are missing are available in hardcover large print versions (so they won’t match your set) under lock and key in the glass display cases toward the Local Interest Yet Reeking of Desperation twirly racks at the front of the store.  They are only available for sale two weeks ago last Thursday. We were selling them for six hundred dollars for one, or both for a special fifteen hundred dollar companion sale.  We are going to sell them again the day after you move to a different town.  Possibly there may be mass market editions in our Vaguely Alphabetical by Author And/Or Series shelves toward the middle of the store.  We monitor the accuracy of the alphabetical shelving every time a new Pope is elected.  So any day now, yes.

If you are interested in applying for a job here, we have applications located on the back bulletin board next to the flyers for the Shabbily-Dressed Buskers Convention at the Learning Annex from two years ago (it was a good time, sorry you missed it) and hiding under the Babysitting by Druselda the Goth Clown Slash Tattoo Artist (no, not the symbol “/” the actual word, yes) flyers.  Part 1 is the “Do You Know Less About Books Not By Your Professors Than, Say, A Turnip?” questionnaire.  That weeds out the brainy types who have actually read books and thus can comment about the selections we have for sale.  Sometimes customers are offended by people who know what’s actually in some books.  Part 2 is the “Can You Come In Every Day You Aren’t Scheduled?” survey.

We do have a water fountain, yes.  It’s located next to the Manga You Don’t Want section in the basement.  You have to go up to the second floor and use the down staircase adjacent to the Manga You Are Interested In Trying But We’re Missing the First and Last Volumes shelves.

Some board games are located in the Basically Like Risk, Yes corner below the All Things Potter Shrine.  It’s mostly versions of Munchkin, I hope that’s what you wanted.  We do have some inappropriate for children and dictionary-definition “mature” adults “party” games as well.  There may be some other games Various Social Media Personalities and Target told us to get.  Conveniently for you, we are offering them at 20% above MSRP.  Additionally, we have some used games for sale located in a plastic crate under the drinking fountain.  Just like you do with your games at home, we have sealed them up tightly with packing tape so you can’t check to see if all the pieces are included before buying it.  Similarly with our gigantic price tag stickers, any attempt to remove the tape will end up removing anything printed on the covers.  Prices were taken from eBay searches by someone who has never played any board games and thought the game was close enough to the most expensive thing he could find while searching for random items.

Now that you have made your purchase, let me tell you about our Loyal Customer Reward Program that would have helped you had you enrolled before your purchase.  For every $100 you spend, you are entered once in a monthly raffle for a $2 Off A Purchase Of $50 Or More coupon.  Purchase totals do not expire until the end of the month.  Also on the back of your receipt is a survey opportunity: if you enter the thirty-two digit passcode within the next forty-five minutes, you will be directed to a simple survey about your experiences today, should take you no more than three hours to complete.  At the end, it will send you a link to a non-printable coupon for seventy-five cents off your purchase at the fast food restaurant next door that went out of business last month.

Sadly, no, we don’t accept returns or offer refunds: our receipts are printed with special disappearing ink so all written proof of your visit here vanishes as soon as you leave the store.

Thanks for shopping with us!  Have a nice day!

Who’s Your James Bond?

Destiny Phillips Coats

Who is James Bond? James Bond is a sixty-four-year-old British secret service agent, played by six different film actors since his birth in the first Ian Fleming novel of 1953. Because the James Bond character in the novels has been so memorable, the actors who have played this character have been so as well. Anyone who is a Bond fan probably has his own personal favorite “James Bond.” So again, the question is posed: Who is James Bond to you? Is he Sean Connery, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Pierce Brosnan, or Daniel Craig? This article will walk through which actors played in which movies, which novels those movies spun from, details about the contracts the actors had to sign to play the character, and who is arguably the most famous “James Bond” and why.

From my last set of research, I learned there were 39 novels and 26 films about James Bond’s many adventures. With my most recent research, I have learned there are 42 novels and 25 James Bond films. Because books can cover much more than a movie in greater detail, the films do not hit on every single escapade of Mr. Bond. A few of the films were also remakes of the same excursions as previous movies. All the movies are inspired by the films directly. Most are directly titled after the book they seek to visualize. In the case of Skyfall, there is no Fleming novel entitled Skyfall but many of the scenes and themes are redone from previous films. For example, Bond appearing dead and receiving an obituary is taken from the story You Only Live Twice.

The first actor to take to the screen as James Bond is Sean Connery. Connery’s first Bond film was Dr. No in 1962. He was born to a working-class family in 1930 in Edinburgh, Scotland. He joined the Royal Navy when he was just 16 years old. While in the navy, he got two tattoos. One reads “Mum and Dad” and the other “Scotland Forever.” A stomach ulcer cut his military service shorter than he intended. Upon moving back home, Connery took on many trades. To balance his work life, he took up bodybuilding as a hobby. This would be the bridge that would cross him into acting. Connery’s highlight of his bodybuilding career was his third-place achievement in the Mr. Universe competition in the year 1950. After this success, it took eight years of modeling, small theatrical parts, and work for him to land a supporting role in Another Time, Another Place with actress Lana Turner. This success got him to his first James Bond movie that would change his life forever. Sean Connery would go on to play in five more Bond films and 43 other movies. Connery is said to be one of the greatest actors of all time, earning an Academy Award, two BAFTA awards, three Golden Globes, and knighted Sir Thomas Sean Connery by Queen Elizabeth. Connery is a true testament of how hard work, determination, and humble beginnings can aid anyone in reaching one’s goals.

Five out of six actors who played 007 starred in more than one movie. The famed one-hit wonder who played Mr. Bond is George Lazenby. Lazenby is also the only Bond actor who is not of British Isle decent. Born in 1939 in Australia, Lazenby peaked in his acting career as James Bond at age 29 in the 1969 film On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. With no prior movie roles, Lazenby was a used car salesman who had a small screen career appearing on television commercials for Big Fry’s chocolate bars. Like Connery, George Lazenby had a pretty successful modeling career in London prior to his role as James Bond. When Lazenby heard the news of Connery’s departure from the film series, he did his best to earn the role as Mr. Bond. Buying a tux, Rolex, and getting a haircut like Connery before auditioning for the role all paid off for Mr. Lazenby. After the success of landing the role passed, things no longer looked up for him as Mr. Bond. George Lazenby did not get along with the directors of the film nor his co-stars. He accused Diana Rigg of eating garlic on purpose before their kissing scenes. After the film was released, he received nothing but bad press. He was called a mediocre replacement to the great Sean Connery. A quotation from an article on BBC America explains Lazenby’s departure from the Bond series in more detail:

Lazenby announced that, despite being offered a contract calling for him to perform additional Bond films, he was departing the role. Lazenby’s agent seemingly had convinced him that Bond wasn’t cool enough to survive into the sure-to-be even more swinging 1970s and that he was made for even bigger things. The Bond series producers, already fed up with Lazenby’s oversized sense of entitlement, were happy to see him go.

His prediction about the success of the series could not have been more wrong. After his negative publicity from the film, Lazenby struggled to find other roles.

The third actor to take to the silver screen the same amount of times as Sean Connery is Roger Moore. Moore, now 89, starred in his first bond film Live and Let Die in 1973 at the age of 46. Moore was born in England in 1927. His acting career started in the ’40s and ’50s during his appearances on Broadway. Like Connery, Moore quit school and began work at Publicity Picture Productions at age 15. He started there as an animation apprentice. This would seem like a dream job a young actor would do everything possible not to ruin. Unfortunately, Roger Moore got himself fired shortly after getting hired. Based on his looks, he landed a small role in his first film Caesar and Cleopatra in 1945. Based on his performance in this film, the director decided to enroll and fund him at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts. Like many young men living during this time, his career was cut short due to the military draft. At age 18 Moore was stationed in Germany for three years. There he married his first wife of four. After serving his time, he went back to London to continue his career as an actor. He landed a role on The World by the Tail, which made his acting career take off. He signed a contract with MGM for $250 a week but was cut short because of the lack of popularity his films had at MGM. He later signed with Warner Bros. With them he started acting as a television star on The Alaskans and The Saint, the series that landed him the role of James Bond.

Similar to George Lazenby, Timothy Dalton did not have an extremely successful Bond career. Dalton starred in two James Bond movies starting with The Living Daylights in 1987. Dalton, born in 1946 in Wales, was a Shakespearean actor who landed a role in The Lion in Winter in 1946. His role in sci-fi show Flash Gordon landed him his role as James Bond. At a young age, many thought Dalton would join the military and serve like his father. After seeing a performance of Shakespeare’s Macbeth at 16 years old, Dalton made a career of performing in theater. After much success as a young adult, Dalton was approached about succeeding Connery in the James Bond series at 22; however, he turned the offer down because of his young age and experience. Despite his initial “no,” he developed his talent to a place he thought was good enough for the Bond franchise and played 007 19 years later. His first Bond film was a success though the second was a flop, causing his five-film contract to fall by the wayside.

Mr. Pierce Brosnan, born in Ireland in 1953, assumed his role as James Bond in 1995. Brosnan played in four Bond films starting with GoldenEye. After a rough childhood in Ireland, Brosnan moved to London and joined a theater school. Studying there and landing several roles on London’s stage, he moved to Los Angeles, where he starred as the lead role in the detective series Remington Steele. He received an offer in 1986 to play Bond while in his contract with Remington Steele. Because he could not get out of it, his first opportunity as Mr. Bond passed him by. After the show ended, he finally landed a role as 007 after his success with American film projects in between. After his four successful films, he decided to pass the torch to the most recent Bond film star, Daniel Craig.

Finally, my personal favorite, Daniel Craig assumed the role of James Bond in 2006 in the film remake of David Niven’s spoof Casino Royale. Born in Chester, England in 1968, Craig moved to London at age 16 to join a performing arts school. His first performance in a film was The Power of One in 1992. His career took off after the miniseries Our Friends in the North. This contract landed Craig many more film opportunities that put his career on a linear path to stardom. After working with Stephen Spielberg on the film Munich, Craig landed his role in 2006 as 007. After performing in four successful Bond films, questions of his return to the series or a new Mr. Bond are still in the balance.

Most millennials would probably call Daniel Craig or Pierce Brosnan their “James Bond.” Does this mean the younger generations cannot truly appreciate the personality, style, and artistry the other four great film stars gave to Mr. Bond before these two?  No, of course not. It is simply a matter of opinion. The best part about this opinion question is, no matter who a person calls Mr. Bond, all six actors brought 007 to life in a way only Ian Fleming himself could have anticipated. They are in sync with how he claimed his novels would affect the spy entertainment category: “I am going to write the spy story to end all spy stories,” he said, and the James Bond novels and films have done just that.


Bibliography

“Daniel Craig.” Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 2 Nov. 2015. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

“The Official Website of Sir Sean Connery.” Sean Connery.com, 11 Dec. 2016. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

“Order of James Bond Books.” OrderOfBooks.com. Order of Books, n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

“Pierce Brosnan.” Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 2 Apr. 2014. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

“Roger Moore.” Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 4 Nov. 2015. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

Rozen, Leah. “50 Years of James Bond: George Lazenby, One-Hit Wonder?.” BBC America. New Video Channel America, n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

“Timothy Dalton.” Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 14 Oct. 2014. Web. 11 Dec. 2016.

The Origin of Bond

Destiny Phillips Coats

“Name’s Bond. James Bond,” is one of many famous quotations from Ian Fleming’s 1953 novel character James Bond or agent 007, a British secret intelligence agent. Ian Fleming was born on May 28, 1908 in London, England. Fleming’s book character has taken the entertainment world by storm over the last 64 years. Fleming’s exciting adventures of James Bond have inspired many other writers to develop exciting narratives about Mr. Bond that would also enthrall its audiences. EON Productions, a film production company, is known for producing films associated with James Bond and his many endeavors. Most of the world is familiar with these films, but not so much with the origins of Mr. James Bond found in the original novels by Ian Fleming. This essay seeks to inform readers of the origin and development of its beloved hero, Mr. 007.

To know where the character came from, we must uncover what inspired the author. Believe it or not, Ian Fleming himself and some of his friends were his inspiration for James Bond. Fleming served in the British Naval Intelligence Division during World War II, where he met many agents from his division and elsewhere that were involved in similar adventures as his character 007 would be. He chose this subtle name, Mr. James Bond, to contrast the exciting adventures he would have on his many missions. Fleming once said, “When I wrote the first one in 1953, I wanted Bond to be an extremely dull, uninteresting man to whom things happened; I wanted him to be a blunt instrument … when I was casting around for a name for my protagonist I thought by God, (James Bond) is the dullest name I ever heard.” Ian Fleming gave 007 many similar attributes and likes he himself had. For example, Mr. Bond’s love for gold and gambling were inherited from his author Mr. Fleming. Fleming used names of friends, acquaintances, and old lovers as names for supporting characters in his books. Fleming’s real life and friends played a big role in the making of the most famous secret agent story of all time. Fleming is quoted proclaiming the future success of Mr. Bond to one of his friends saying, “I am going to write the spy story to end all spy stories.” Whether they believed him then or not, it is obvious to us he spoke nothing but the truth.

Fleming wrote the first book, Casino Royale, while in Jamaica in 1952 with his pregnant fiancée. After two months of writing, Fleming asked his friend William Plomer to proof his story. Plomer enjoyed the manuscript. Fleming took his novel to Jonathan Cope who did not like the book very much. On the word of Fleming’s brother Peter, an accredited author, Fleming’s first novel was published in 1953 by Gildrose Publications under Mr. Cope. Jonathan Cope would then publish all of Fleming’s works as the years went on. Because of the success of his book, Fleming bought the publication company. Gildrose desired to have many authors pen stories of James Bond under a common name “Robert Markham,” but unfortunately the idea fell through. Fleming wrote ten James Bond novels and two short story compilations over 12 years.

Ian Fleming died of a heart attack in 1964 as a result of a drinking and smoking problem. Despite his death, Ian Fleming’s legacy lived on among other writers such as Christopher Wood and Kingsley Amis. In his honor, the publishing company was renamed Ian Fleming Publications in 1999. Gildrose honored Fleming’s wishes to not let the James Bond legacy die by handpicking authors to continue the serious up to the present time.

The next James Bond author was John Gardner. Gildrose Publication signed a contract with Mr. Gardner in 1981. He then wrote 16 James Bond novels, two of which became films made by EON Productions. His last Bond novel was published in 1996. Gildrose asked Raymond Benson, an American, to write the next series of Bond novels. Like Gardner, Benson was asked to bring James Bond into the modern era. He did this; however, he was criticized for Americanizing Mr. Bond. Despite criticism, he was praised for returning to Fleming’s original James Bond roots. He wrote his first novel, Zero Minus Ten, in 1997. Benson left Ian Fleming Publications in 2002 after three of his novels were made into films. The next three novelists chosen by Ian Fleming Publications contributed one novel each to the James Bond series. The most recent novelist, Anthony Horowitz, was tasked with creating the thirty-ninth James Bond novel. He used compilations of Fleming’s short stories for inspirations to create the most recent Bond book, Trigger Mortis, released in September 2015. As Ian Fleming Publications has maintained the written Bond series over the last 64 years, EON Productions took on the task of turning James Bond’s adventures on paper into a visual fantasy land for all to emjoy for decades.

Based on Fleming’s novels, James Bond was visually developed in his first film Dr. No in 1962 by EON Productions. Bond’s appearance according to the book and even more so in the movies are a fitted suit, gun, fancy car, and cool gadgets. Iconic images of James Bond include him in a suit with either a cigarette, gun, alcoholic beverage in hand, or a combination of the three. There have been eight actors who have played the character of James Bond on screen in a total of 25 movies and 1 spoof over the last 54 years. The first being Sean Connery, then David Niven, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Pierce Brosnan, and, most recently, Daniel Craig.  Four other men have been noted for portraying James Bond on the radio and in the first television episodes: Barry Nelson, Bob Holness, Christopher Cazenove, Michael Jayston, and Toby Stephens. Often the changing of an actor to the same character can anger and cause distaste for the series with the public. However, the love for James Bond has only grown over the years to the point his actors will be remembered and honored for all time.

Sean Connery, the first face of James Bond, is arguably the most famous 007 actor. In his first film, Dr. No in 1962, the classic James Bond theme music was played. This music was written by Monty Norman and performed by the John Barry Orchestra. Another essential of the Bond movies is a song played by a well-known artist during the title sequence of the production. The most recent song was Sam Smith’s “Writings on the Wall” in the 2015 bond film Spectre. These songs have become not only hits by the artists who sing them but also will forever be symbols of James Bond productions.

Classic James Bond items like his gun, car, and gadgets have changed over the course of Fleming’s writings in the ’50s and ’60s and the movie adaptations from the ’60s to the present. For example, a fan of the Bond novels in the ’50s, Geoffrey Boothroyd, suggested a change to Fleming of Bond’s weapon, the Beretta 418, because it was a “lady’s gun.”

In thanks, Fleming gave the MI6 Armorer in his novels the name Major Boothroyd and, in Dr. No, M introduces him to Bond as “the greatest small-arms expert in the world.” Bond also used a variety of rifles, including the Savage Model 99 in “For Your Eyes Only” and a Winchester .308 target rifle in “The Living Daylights.” Other handguns used by Bond in the Fleming books included the Colt Detective Special and a long-barreled Colt .45 Army Special (Daily News Dig).

Also Bond’s cars have ranged from Bentley to bus and BMW to Aston Martin.

Bond’s most famous car is the silver gray Aston Martin DB5, first seen in Goldfinger; it later featured in Thunderball, GoldenEye, Tomorrow Never Dies, Casino Royale and Skyfall. The films have used a number of different Aston Martins for filming and publicity, one of which was sold in January 2006 at an auction in the US for $2,090,000 to an unnamed European collector (Daily News Dig).

Interestingly, Fleming’s novels and first screenplays consisted of very few gadgets. The films developed by EON Productions are what we thank for the extensive and exciting briefings with Q Branch, Bond’s tech support from whom agent 007 receives his many trinkets that aid him in fighting crime and completing his missions. Thanks to the creativity of Ian Fleming, his fans, Ian Fleming Publications, and EON Productions, we have a series that has lived on for over 60 years and hopefully will continue for generations to come.

Novel after novel and movie after movie, James Bond has landed a place in the hearts of men, women, and children from 1953 to 2017. Over the course of these 64 years, James Bond has been developed by 7 authors, 12 actors, one publishing company, and one entertainment group. There are 42 James Bond books and 26 films. A new James Bond actor is being chosen as of this writing, along with the making of another action-packed film. Unlike many other series, James Bond is an entertaining work known for being adapted by many. Ian Fleming meant it when he said, “I am going to write the spy story to end all spy stories,” and we can all agree that this is exactly what he did.

Bibliography

Daily News Dig. “James Bond History — Discover The Secret Agent’s Origins And More.” Daily News Dig. Daily News Dig, 29 Nov. 2013. Web. 09 Oct. 2016.

Fandom. “James Bond Books.” James Bond Wiki. Wikia, n.d. Web. 09 Oct. 2016.

“James Bond — Ian Fleming.” Ian Fleming. Ian Fleming Publications, 2016. Web. 09 Oct. 2016.

“Who Played James Bond: A Complete History.” Who Played James Bond: A Complete History. 007 James, n.d. Web. 09 Oct. 2016.

Why Wait?

Katie Kenney

The temptation of procrastination is so easy to fall into. Don’t want to write your English paper? Don’t, you’ll have time to later.  Don’t want to clean your room? Don’t, it will still be there looking like it was hit by a tornado and an atomic bomb all at once. Don’t want to make amends in your friendship just yet? Don’t, that person and the problems that seem to come with them will still be at school tomorrow and the days following. Putting things off is easy to do and it doesn’t hurt at first. Eventually, however, problems will arise. Maybe the stress of writing a long paper the night before it’s due is too much to handle and a mental breakdown ensues. Maybe your mess isn’t there in all its glory, but instead has moved to the smaller bedroom that was previously your younger sister’s. And maybe, just maybe, your friend is no longer your friend because the damage has settled in and there’s no way to repair the relationship. There are consequences of every, single thing that we do in our lifetime. The consequences of procrastination are not normally the happy kind. Putting off what can be done today isn’t the best decision, even though it is incredibly enticing. Procrastination may be the easier and more appealing thing in the short run, but doing something and taking advantage of the time you have in the now is better for everyone in the long run.

There are many different areas in any person’s life that they can procrastinate in. Someone could procrastinate in the athletic aspect of their life by putting off their daily rep of squats or something along that line. Someone could very easily procrastinate in an academic way. Practically every student in high school has, at some point, put off doing some sort of homework, whether it be a math worksheet or a history project. The cleanliness of an area, or a person could be put off as well. Cleaning the dishes or making the bed can just seem so unimportant, so it is put off until further notice. Even though procrastination is usually left to those three main things, someone could procrastinate in the realm of their relationships. This includes putting off a needed conversation with a loved one, saying that you’ll fix your friendship another time, and other things of the like. Humans have the amazing ability to put off practically anything which includes things other than a high schooler’s science homework.

Unless you are some crazy cross-fitter, getting up at the crack of dawn to willingly put your body in pain and sweat out everything you drank in the past three days doesn’t sound too appealing.  Working out is hard and it just doesn’t sound like a bringer of great joy to the average person. Many people want to work out, whether it be to lose weight or just to feel healthier. However, a lot of people just put it off, saying that they are too busy at the moment or that they just need a minute to take a breather because they have been moving constantly all day. That doesn’t help one reach their goal obviously. Sitting down and putting aside physical obligations can be so easy but it is still not good. Good things don’t come easy. You have to work for things and that includes anything in the realm of athletics.

Procrastination is notorious for being a huge part of a high school student’s life, along with a college student’s life. People say that teenagers just put things off because they don’t want to deal with it, but that isn’t always the case. There are instances where doing one more piece of homework feels like it could make your brain explode. Stress can build up because there are times when a large amount of homework, studying, projects, and presentations are present. Sometimes all a student wants is an extra hour of sleep, so they put off finishing their math homework in order to get that precious hour of sleep. Procrastination, in all aspects of life, isn’t always because someone just doesn’t want to do something. Still, that doesn’t make procrastination any better. Getting an extra hour of sleep can be possible but there must be better choices in time management. Doing homework right off the bat is better for your mental health and your schedule. If you get things done right away, then you won’t have to deal with them later on. If you want to go to an event, but you don’t plan properly and have a build-up of school assignments, then it is most likely that you won’t go to that event. Procrastinating can keep you from doing the things that you want to, so just do things when you first get the chance and you’ll be able to do things other than nothing and school work. 

Stress is easily come by when one puts things off. Having to keep track of the things that you have done and the things that need to be done can get messy very quickly in the human mind. Worry about getting everything done seems to be a low mumble in the procrastinator’s head. At some point, panic can ensue and that is when everything falls apart. Whatever was holding the person together shatters into a million pieces along with their sanity. They can feel like they aren’t going to get any of the things that they needed to get done actually done and that can stress a person out beyond belief. No one needs any extra stress in their lives, so it seems like just doing things when you first have the opportunity to is the better option for any person’s mental health. Stress is obviously not good for the mind, but it is also not good for the body. A person who has too much stress in their life can have headaches, muscle tension or pain, chest pain, fatigue, sleeping problems, and some other not so positive things as said by the Mayo Clinic. A person can also experience some behavioral changes such as overeating or undereating, angry outbursts, drug or alcohol abuse, a sudden start in smoking, and social withdrawal.

Pushing things off to do nothing or something less important is an easy way to waste time. Time is precious and we only have so much of it. It is easy to lose track of time, but we should never waste it. We need to take advantage of the time we are given. We need to pursue every moment and do what needs to be done instead of putting it off. When a person procrastinates, they are wasting time. Instead of doing something that they need to, they are saying that they will do it later. This means that they are wasting the time they could be doing something beneficial or something that at least needs to be done. Putting things off isn’t a good use of time, so just following through with your responsibilities can make your time more valuable than wasted time. 

Goals are set often, but so many of those goals are not completed. Things can come up that may make the goal change slightly or even be dismissed entirely. However, a good portion of uncompleted goals are incomplete because of procrastination. A goal set to get homework and chores done by seven can never be fulfilled because the dishes are going to be done later by the teenager who hasn’t even started their math homework. But, you know, at least they finished their history paper and cleaned their room because that’s still something. However, the goal that was originally set is never met because someone put something off to do at a different time that is on a later day. This doesn’t just apply to little goals, but also to the big ones that matter. A smoker postponing their goal of being clean isn’t something that can be taken lightheartedly. Smoking can cause all sorts of medical problems, that is a known fact. So, dismissing a goal of stopping smoking isn’t something that someone should do with a wave of the hand. Smoking can lead to the death and that isn’t something that is widely wanted. Yes, it is hard to quit smoking once it has become a habit, which happens quite soon, but putting it off doesn’t make it any easier. It just makes it harder because if you continue to push things off and nothing happens because of the postponing, why would one want to actually do it? That state of nothing happening because of the procrastination doesn’t last forever. Something will eventually happen when you continue to do nothing. Goals can be hard to achieve, but they aren’t necessarily impossible. Pushing through and doing what needs to be done is better than pushing things off. 

If you have the opportunity to do something, to say something and make a difference why in the world wouldn’t you? It can be scary, so immensely scary, and that is entirely understandable. But keeping quiet and hoping that someone else will do it for you is not comprehendible. No one can say exactly what you want to say because everyone is different and special in their own way. Convincing yourself to stay silent until a later time allows a situation to stay unchanged even though it desperately needs an altercation. Everyone makes an impact and everyone has the ability to make that impact a good one. Human life is only existent for so long and we need to take advantage of the opportunities that we get. No one should aim to hurt others in this world, but aim to better those around them.

Habits are incredibly hard to break. Smokers and alcoholics tend to go back to their old ways even after being clean for a good sum of time. It just seems normal to them, right even. Just because they think it’s right though, doesn’t mean that it is. Procrastination is a cycle that anyone can easily fall into. Once someone starts procrastinating it is difficult to break that habit and start doing things on a more regulated schedule. Procrastination can seem like a good habit sometimes, a habit that isn’t necessarily too harmful and it feels good when you do it for a certain amount of time. No matter how it feels though, it isn’t good for anyone. Bad habits may feel like they aren’t bad, but they really are. That feeling causes it to be more difficult to get rid of the habit, but it is still necessary. Procrastination is a bad habit that we need to be rid of.

Having a deep conversation or a difficult one can be intimidating for any person. Putting a difficult, but needed, conversation off will only make the conversation harder when it is said. In some cases, the conversation could’ve been quick, easy, and over in the matter of two minutes. Overtime, new problems can arise, making that short, little conversation into a long difficult one that brings a multitude of hurt. Sometimes, there can be worse consequences if a conversation is put off. Maybe the person with whom you need to speak with is no longer available for conversation, whether it be because they have lost contact with you due to distance, they no longer want to talk to you, or they just aren’t here anymore. Time is ticking and we need to do things while we still can, say things when we still have the opportunity to. People are constantly changing and that means that the conversations that are held with them are changing too. Sometimes that change is a good one, but other times that change can feel like it’s catastrophic. Waiting and putting it off can make it even worse. Doing things when we first have the opportunity is the best thing to do. It can be hard to do, but it needs to be done. It’s like getting a shot as a kid. Most kids are scared of needles and associate shots with immense pain. And at first, it can be painful, seeing as something is being stabbed into your arm or some other part of your body. To a kid, it can seem like the worst thing in the entire world is getting that shot. So, some kids cry and throw fits, trying to postpone the inevitable shot. It still happens though and it hurts them. Eventually, the pain fades away and the kid can see the benefits when every other kid in their class, who didn’t get a shot is getting sick. Having difficult conversations are painful. It can be exhausting and draining, not only to the body, but also to the soul. It can seem like the worst thing in the entire world, but it still needs to be done. One day, whether it be the day of the conversation or twenty years later, the hurt won’t be existent any longer. Postponing the hard conversations will only cause someone more pain in total. Getting them done and over with is the smart choice. And really, no one wants to be the kid who throws a temper tantrum when they have to get a shot.

Human life has a definite beginning and a definite end. Babies are born and that is the obvious start of a person’s life. And then, after a certain amount of time, which has been chosen by God, a person will die and that is the end of their life on earth. Christians have been given eternal life in Heaven by the grace of God, but that is not life on earth. Heavenly life will be so indescribably better than earthly life. However, we still need to make the most of what we have on earth. We need to spread the gospel and not wait for someone else to or until we feel more comfortable. We have to act in the now because this is what we have. There will come a point in time where you can’t say that you’ll do it tomorrow because you won’t be there tomorrow. On a less morbid note, we still can’t say that we’ll do it tomorrow because we never know how long things last. Everything changes over time unless it is something true that has been by God. We can’t expect things to be exactly the same as we left it no matter what Newton’s First Law of Motion says. Change is a regular occurrence, that is known. So, no one can sit around expecting things to be the exact same way they were before they started to do it. Everything changes and we need to pay attention to those changes instead of putting of dealing with them until tomorrow.

Bibliography

Mayo Clinic. “Stress symptoms: Effects on your body and behavior.” Mayo Clinic. www.mayoclinic.org/helathy-lifestyle/stress-management/in-depth/stress-symptoms/art-20050987 6 Dec. 2016.

O’Donovan, Kirstin. “8 Ways Procrastination Can Destroy Your Life.” Lifehack. www.lifehack.org/articles/productivity/8-ways-procrastination-can-destroy-your-life.html 6 Dec. 2016

Is Space Exploration a Good Investment?

Tim Seaton

Space exploration is a hotly debated topic right now in the world. Some people question if it is worth the time, money, or if it is even important. Countries put millions into space programs, so obviously it is important to them, but what is the result of this investment? Is investing in space exploration so important it is worth the time and money spent on it? If it is, then we should continue investing in it; but if not, then why waste the effort on it?

There are some reasons why space exploration is not a good investment. Some of these reasons are people thinking it will use too much of our resources, we could use the fuel used for the space program here on earth, space exploration is only important to a select few right now, and almost all the planets are too far out to reach in a lifetime.

We could manage our resources by not focusing on space travel right now. We could be improving our technology now and then using it to create more affordable space travel. It could save us tons of time and money instead of starting it now. Also, natural resources are limited on the earth. When we are sending people into space, we are using up some of those resources that can’t be easily replaced, if at all. We should be using our resources to better our planet now, and when it is better, then we should invest because that is when it will become important.

Also, we could be using our fuel for gas here on earth where we could lower prices, save money, and use that extra money to go into research for items that would make space exploration more affordable and easier than it is now. We would be wasting fuel by going to Mars and trying to establish a colony there because Mars is so far away, and they would have to take our limited amount to there at one time. It would be a waste of fuel and space to try and take it all up at one time, so why do it at all? Wait until we can use fuel more efficiently. We use money for the use of other projects that in turn can help the pace program, but we should use the money for projects that will definitely help us on earth until it is necessary.

Right now, space exploration is only important to a few people compared to the whole rest of the world. The price from a Virgin Galactic airlines space flight that is 5 minutes long for one person is $250,000! That is a whopping $50,000 a minute. A flight in a two seater rocket from Xcor will be $95,000 a person. All of the available options right now are much too expensive for anyone but millionaires and billionaires, and even they may be hesitant when they see the exorbitant prices set in place, even when they have the money to do it. They will want to use their wealth on things that are better than what other celebrities have. No common folk can pay these prices, so why invest in what you can’t and won’t make much money on? Put that toward something actually useful like making new technology for businesses that are producing items every person can use.

Also, most of the stars and planets are too far off to reach in a lifetime. Jupiter at its closest is 377,866,000 miles away from us. It would take us 4 years to travel to Jupiter with our modern technology, but as our technology advances, we are able to decrease that time and the amount of money spent to make that trip there and back. We should wait until we can use our resources better and make the time shorter.

There are also many good reasons why space exploration is important. Some of them are understanding and protecting our planet, new technology, answering big questions, international co-operations, long-term survival, fuel, and promoting scientific education, new discoveries, and mapping the solar system and seeing back to our planet.

First, space exploration is important because it helps us understand and protect our planet. For example, when we were trying to build a spaceship to fly through space, we had to learn what the gravity was so we can know how much thrust and fuel we need. We had to know what materials weighed so we could find the escape velocity of the ship. Every little variable played a key part of getting that ship into space. From this we learned just a few of the many wonders and interesting ideas the universe holds for us to discover. If we have all of what we have here on earth, what could we find on other planets humans have never set foot on? We should explore to find out what is there, and so this is important to us as humans and our society advancing. We need to keep exploring what will help us as a society.

Another reason space exploration is important is because of the technology that can be created for the space program. When we are making spaceships, we are finding and creating more and more technology we can use for other reasons. We are finding ways to make ships faster and more aerodynamic. We can apply this to other man-made objects like cars to make them better. We are creating new computers that are smaller and making programs for them we can use in those objects. Many of the technologies we are creating for spaceships can be applied to many other products, so it is important because it helps us improve what is happening here on earth as well as other planets. One example is the parachutes spaceships use upon entry back into the atmosphere. The parachute material was found to be a great material to make tires out of, so now there are tires and parachutes made out of the same material. Also, there are the red light emitting diodes. There is chemical detection used for leaks in spaceships, and so we use that here on earth as a chemical detector in radioactive plants to detect leaks. They help growing plants in space, and they have been converted to help on earth with healing humans. We can keep innovating things like this so we can use more and more of this technology on the earth. We can use pretty much anything if we are creative enough to find uses.

Space exploration will also help with answering big questions. One of the most hotly contested questions is are we the only ones out there in the universe? Some others are how did the universe come to be? and how did life originate on the earth? When we are flying through space, we are able to explore places and find answers to these questions. We can use space exploration to answer questions if we look hard enough, long enough, and use the right resources and manage them. Space exploration will also open up new questions to us as we explore more and more of space. If we keep exploring, we will have new questions opened up to us that will help us understand the world and space more. One example of this is the probe we sent past Jupiter. It found out the big red dot was a storm and Pluto was a dwarf planet. We can keep answering these questions we have by exploring more and more of the galaxy.

Space exploration fosters international cooperation. When countries see a common goal, they will combine. The space program promoted global cooperation. The United States, Russia, Canada, Japan, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, France, England, and many more made an agreement to work together for the good of humans to explore space. Before, the U.S. and Russia had the Cold War in which they were both trying to get to the moon before the other did. This feud stopped when the U.S. got there first and an international alliance was made for the sake of space exploration. Many ships sent into space have had crews of many different countries. Space exploration is drawing countries who used to be enemies together as allies. The more we keep finding common goals like this, the more we can keep cooperating with those countries.

Long-term survival may also rely on space exploration. Right now, the earth’s population is growing at a crazy rate. Eventually, the world will not be able to hold everybody. Currently, manned missions are being planned to go to Mars to start a colony. The companies running it are hoping for the astronauts to start up the livable arrangements so others can move in and make more room on the earth. If we moved 1 billion people, then we could free up considerable space for others on earth. We have some technology to be able to get to planets, but we are not prepared yet. It is important to get there because humans’ long-term survival may rely on us getting there and being able to live. When others say space exploration is only important to a few, it isn’t. We don’t know when we will need more space, so why not start now? We should be prepared for the worst to happen. If something like a nuclear war happened, would we not want to be able to leave and go to a clean and unspoiled planet?

There is also fuel we do not have here on earth. The fossil fuels here on earth are slowly becoming a less and less reliable source because they are being used up and unable to be replenished fast enough, so sources will eventually run up along with the oil. We will need more fuel soon, and that can be solved by mining fuels on the moon. The main one that would provide us with the most fuel is helium 3. This substance could fuel us a lot better than what we have now. It could last longer and give us more fuel. It would also help with our long-term survival. This is definitely a good reason why we should explore space.

Exploring space also helps up with being able to map out space and find new objects. With the Hubble Telescope, we have been able to find out about new galaxies and stars. We have been able to track weather patterns with satellites. Space exploration has made all of this possible. We are able to warn people of hurricanes coming toward them days in advance because of the satellites and space exploration. We have been able to map out our galaxy because of space exploration. Many things here on earth have been made possible by space exploration, so it is obviously important to us and we should continue doing it.

We should also explore because once you start exploring and advancing technologically, you start decreasing your ability to keep creating more new technology. We should be able to continue that exploration of finding new technology by continuing the space exploration. One example of this is zero gravity. If we had not explored space, we would never know about this. We should keep exploring because we will find more out.

Finally, space exploration is important because of kids. Space exploration encourages scientific education and kids to delve deeper into the science of it. When people have something that interests them, they want to learn more about it. Through the space program, kids hear about it and are interested in it. They want to know about it and what they can do with it. It interests them in a whole new topic. It pushes us to the limit of what we can do. We are always facing new problems we find, and so it is showing when you face a problem head on, it be easier than trying to avoid it. One example of this is being educated in science class. When we learn about space, we are able to learn about science and the interesting pieces of it, so students get hooked and want to learn more.

In conclusion, there are many parts to each side of this argument. Because of the ability to further our technology, protect the planet more, help students become better educated, obtaining resources we don’t have here on earth, long-term survival, international cooperation, and answering big questions, I say the benefits outweigh the harms. Therefore, I think investing in continuing space exploration is a good idea.

On Sylvia Plath

Emma Kenney

Sylvia Plath was born in Boston, Massachusetts on October 27, 1932 to Otto Emil Plath and Aurelia Schober Plath. Her brother Warren was born roughly 3 years later in 1935. Plath grew up Winthrop, Massachusetts, located near Boston. Her father worked at Boston University in Boston until his health began to drastically decline leading to his death shortly after Plath’s eighth birthday. The man had thought he was dying of lung cancer, but he had actually died due to diabetes, something which could have been treated and managed with relative ease.

Shortly after the death of Otto Plath, Aurelia Plath moved Sylvia and Warren to Wellesley. This would be Plath’s home from the time she was ten until the time she left for college. After the move, Plath became an exceptional student, having all “A”s but especially excelling in her English courses. The girl’s first poem was published in The Boston Herald in 1941 after the death of Otto Plath when she was only eight. Plath eventually received a scholarship to an all-girls college called Smith College. The college was located relatively close to home, in Northampton, Massachusetts. She continued to write poetry during this stage of her life, though not much of it was published. Though Plath had the technical skill of a successful writer, she had yet to figure out what it was exactly she was trying to say. The stress of trying to maintain the exceptional grades she had gotten before college also affected the quality of the poems and stories Plath produced during these years of her life.

However, by 1953 Plath was well on the track to becoming a successful author. Her works were published in magazines and newspapers alike, such as The Christian Science Monitor and The Daily Hampshire Gazette. Eventually Plath’s writing earned her a guest editor position for a magazine in New York City over the summer. She stayed with a few other women at an all-women hotel in the city, which she wrote about in her novel The Bell Jar. That summer was incredibly difficult for the young woman, and it ultimately did her more harm than good. Plath had been hoping to be accepted into a writing program at Harvard and was devastated when she got the news she had been rejected. This, among other things, led to the woman being physically and mentally drained and eventually having a mental breakdown. Plath returned home in a much worse state than the one she had been in when she had left for New York City only a few months prior. She wrote she could barely sleep or write or even read, though her mother says one of the only things she did was read. Eventually, Plath decided to try to commit suicide. She left a note for her family telling them she was going for a walk, but in reality the girl took a glass of water and a bottle of sleeping pills into a crawl space in the house and attempted suicide. The young woman was found two days later still living but not in good health. She was admitted at McLean Hospital in Belmont where she was treated by Dr. Ruth Barnhouse Beuscher. Though it was hard, Plath would eventually recover and be in good enough shape to go back to Smith College for the spring semester.

Things began to look up after Plath returned to college. She met a man named Richard Sassoon, and the two eventually became lovers. Her grades were once again outstanding, despite everything she had experienced that past year. Plath reapplied for Harvard’s summer program, and this time the young woman was accepted into it. That summer she shared an apartment in Massachusetts with a woman named Nancy Hunter-Steiner, who was also in Harvard’s summer program. Plath returned to Smith College the following year, where she continued to excel. Her honors English thesis was superb, and after the woman graduated she received a scholarship to attend Cambridge in England the following year. Plath returned home for the summer and eventually ended things with Richard Sassoon, saying she preferred to see what kind of men England had to offer her.

Though Plath had been thrilled to be able to attend a university as highly renowned as Cambridge, the woman was in for a rude awakening when she arrived. Plath had not realized how hard it would be to be an American in the midst of British students. She spent her first few weeks in England simply sightseeing before she arrived at Cambridge for the school year. Her first disappointment was the fact her dorm was at the very back of the university. However, Plath soon fell in love with the campus and all it had to offer her. Plath soon realized the British education system was incredibly different from that of America and struggled to adjust to the new way of academics she was being forced to experience. Eventually the woman found a mentor and got used to the new system of college. She ultimately found she had an easier time at Cambridge than she did during all her years at Smith College in the United States. This caused Plath to decide to join something called the Amateur Dramatics Club, which was basically a small theater program for college kids at Cambridge. While she was participating in this club Plath received a small role as a clinically insane poet.

Eventually Sylvia Plath got back together with Richard Sassoon, who was staying in Paris at the time. The two spent their winter vacations together in Paris and other parts of Europe. However, shortly after Plath returned to Cambridge Sassoon wrote to her and requested they take a break in their relationship for a while. Plath soon fell into a horrible depression caused by this breakup and the fact she hated the harsh winter she was experiencing in England. On top of this depression, Plath was ill quite frequently that winter and even ended up with a splinter in her eye. Plath eventually decided to see a psychiatrist named Dr. Davy after it got to be too much for her to handle on her own. The young woman was furious at Sassoon for breaking up with her and was desperate to find someone who would love her at all.

After she left her appointment with Dr. Davy, Plath purchased a literary journal and read poems by a man named Ted Hughes. She quickly found out about a party being held for the poet at the Falcon Yard that night. Plath went to the party with a date, but she promptly ditched him and began looking for Ted. The two found each other, and Plath recited some of poems she had memorized only hours earlier. Hughes was impressed by this, and the two began dating soon after the party. Plath even went on spring break with him that year.

The next year Plath moved in with Hughes instead of staying on campus at Cambridge. Eventually, in 1956, the two married without informing Ted’s family. Plath continued to study at Cambridge until 1957 when the two decided to move to America. By this point, Hughes’s parents knew about the marriage, and Ted’s mother decided to have a party for the couple where the two made lots of new connections. They had both been continuously writing up to this point, and they both continued to do so after. They were given many new opportunities for people to read and experience their works.

Plath took a job teaching, but she found it so much harder than she had originally thought, and her depression began coming back again. She eventually quit her teaching job and went back to writing poetry, but things continued to get harder for her. Her health began to get bad again around Christmas, and she was bedridden for weeks. After that, she began fighting with Ted. It is rumored the man began beating her around this time period. Shortly after, the two had their first child named Frieda. Plath became pregnant again later, but that pregnancy resulted in a miscarriage. Plath got pregnant a third time and give birth to a son. Plath and Ted eventually divorced and Plath moved away with the children. She continued to write frequently throughout this time until her death.

On February 11, 1963, Sylvia Plath used a gas oven to kill herself, first making sure to seal off the door between her and her children and make sure her neighbors weren’t home. Her death was determined to have been a contemplated suicide, with too much detail and thought having gone into it for it to have been a spur of the moment choice. Plath’s depression plays heavily into her image today, and leaves her one of America’s most famous poets.

Bibliography

Beckmann, Leipzig Anja. “Sylvia Plath (1932-1963).” Sylvia Plath Homepage. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Feb. 2017. <http://www.sylviaplath.de/&gt;.

Steinberg, Peter K. “Biography.” Sylvia Plath. N.p., Dec. 2007. Web. 09 Feb. 2017. <http://www.sylviaplath.info/biography.html&gt;.

Your Own Voice

Katie Kenney

“To gain your own voice, you have to forget about having it heard.” ~ Allen Ginsberg

In today’s world, everyone wants their opinions to be listened to. People yell and scream just for their one sentence to be heard by those around them. Being civil to one another isn’t seen as important when people think they deserve to be heard. On social media, people spew their opinions about everything anywhere they can, whether it be commenting on the media or posting something. In rallies, campaigns, and other events that are similar, the volume rises as people become desperate. They resort to speaking louder and stronger if they are given no attention. Everyone is so desperate to be listened to because it is said if no one pays attention to you then you shouldn’t have said anything at all and you don’t even matter. Validation is found by others and that just isn’t okay. Everyone should have their own voice and not care so much about what other people think. No one should fight to be heard.

Increasing the volume of the voice will not make it heard easier. In a Socratic circle, people sit in a circle of chairs and talk about a given topic. It is supposed to be civil. No one should be talked over or have their words rudely dismissed. However, a point can come where people ignore the “rules” of the Socratic circle. Someone is talked over being another person finds what they have to say is more important. Opinions are said to be stupid so another’s opinion can be seen as smart compared to it. The volume rises and rises, with no limit to the noise apparent. It gets out of control. People just want to be heard so they yell at each other as someone yells right back at them, but neither can hear what the other has to say because they are so focused on getting their words the loudest. Eventually, the circle calms down or is told to tone it down by someone who is outside of the circle. When reviewing what had happened, no one knows what was said by the others because they were trained on being heard themselves. If someone gets loud, then those around that person will get loud as well. It’s a chain reaction that will only end in a crash. There is a difference between speaking up and speaking over. Standing up for what you believe in and putting your thoughts out in the open can be absolutely terrifying. Speaking over someone so what you believe to be true can be heard takes no courage at all, just disrespect. No one can hear the person who talks over another because the words muddle together and the people were originally listening to the first speaker.

In a crowded room or area, it is hard to pick out a specific speaker or even a particular conversation. It is incredibly loud, with the volume rising and lowering when a new speaker joins or leaves a conversation. At times when this pertains, people can get loud so those around them can hear what they are trying to say. However, despite their tries, the people around them might not hear or understand a single word they’ve said because so many other people are doing the exact same thing. All the words mix together, allowing no one to be heard entirely. Trying to get louder than the crowd just won’t work and it can be irritating, but there are other opportunities to finish the interrupted discussion that was being held. There are times when things need to be said right then in that instant, but if it is a regular conversation the words can wait. There is almost always another chance to share your opinion on a topic. There is no need to push people aside so others can hear you.

No one likes to be talked over so someone else can be heard. Firstly, it’s plain rude to ignore and dismiss what someone has to say in order for what you have to say to be heard. The Bible says to put God first, others second, and ourselves last. If Christians interrupt someone spitefully they aren’t obeying what God has said because they are putting themselves above others. Christians are supposed to be kind to others and show God’s love through them, but if they deliberately speak over someone because they think they should be heard instead of the person, they aren’t showing any kind of love, let alone God’s love. Love is patient and love is kind, as said in 1 Corinthians 13:4-7. Love also isn’t self-seeking, which people are when they decide they are a large degree better than everyone else. Deliberately disobeying the Bible is deliberately disobeying God and that isn’t at all what Christianity is about.

On social media, it is a common occurrence to see people’s opinions spewed everywhere they can be, whether it be in the form of a meme or just a plain old comment. There comes a point when the freedom of speech seems to have become freedom of cruelty toward everyone everywhere. There are regular fights in the comment section because someone disagreed with what another had to say and it turned into the two getting angry, using the caps lock way too much, and ultimately insulting the other in any way they possibly can. This can happen between absolute strangers on the Internet or it could even be those who talk to each other in real life. Either way, if someone is saying her opinion is superior to someone else’s, then it doesn’t matter who she is arguing with. They will still want to show their supposed superiority and sometimes if they feel as if what they’re saying is less than what someone else has to say, they’ll resort to insulting the person. Insulting someone because you feel like she is better than you is a defense mechanism. It allows someone to ignore her feeling of inferiority and foist a feeling of inferiority on the person who she actually believes is superior.

At some point in everyone’s life, there is a person who is quiet and doesn’t really have anything to say. They don’t contribute to discussion much so their opinion on things is unknown except to those to whom they do talk. One day, there comes a time when a discussion is being had and the shy, quiet person says something and people are amazed because they never hear her opinions. People pay attention to what she has to say because they don’t know how long it will be until they get to hear her speak again. People value her words so much more than they value the guy’s words who screams his opinions at you. When words are meaningful and thought out, they are more valuable than the words thrown at people in a millisecond. In the same way, opinions said by a person who is patient and mindful to what others have to say are better listened to than the opinions of someone who yells over people to be heard and doesn’t care if he is being rude, only that what he says is louder than what anyone else has to say. People are listened to if they are kind and civil toward others and do not tear people down in order to build themselves, or their opinions, up.

In this world, it can be hard to feel like you are listened to, that what you say matters. People everywhere fight to be the best, whether it be in sports, in a debate, or just in casual discussion. If someone’s voice is talked over and stomped by those around them, then that person can easily feel as if she should have no voice at all. There are times when someone is insulted because another person thinks what she said was stupid, or something along those lines and getting insulted can hurt. It can be painful to be told what you thought up and said isn’t worthy of the conversation being held. It can warp a person’s mind into thinking everything she says is stupid and unworthy. She may start to wonder why she even contributes to conversations and why she doesn’t just stop. She can think she should stop because there’s no point in talking if everything that comes out is useless. So, she might stop. It can start out as just speaking less and not getting involved in excessive conversation. It can turn into not starting conversations and barely being able to hold a discussion. Their constant contribution can become a few sentences spoken every day. They might lose their voice, literally and figuratively. If they don’t speak what’s on their minds, then it’s almost as if they’ve become mute and aren’t trying to do anything about it. And they won’t unless they find a reason to. However, the day can come when a discussion happens and they are passionate about the topic. They can say something, whether it be out of pure passion for what is being discussed or be because someone urged them to use their words. Either way, people heard what they said and are taken aback just because the normally quiet people said something. Over time, confidence can grow and fall because relapses and breakdowns are real, and there will come a time when the people are contributing to conversations the same amount of times all around them are. They can get their voices back and they did because they stopped caring so much about what other people thought. They stopped caring about whether they were heard or not and that allowed them to develop into the person who says things and is listened to.

Insecure people can care so much about what other people think. Even the every day person, who doesn’t have many things they dislike about themselves or aren’t very comfortable with, can care about other people’s opinions. Caring too much about what other people think can be debilitating. Opinions can cease to exist, clothing can change, and confidence can decrease just because of what others say. Losing your voice can be a possibility when you care a lot about what other people think about you. Everyone is her own person, with her own thoughts and opinions, desires and pleasures, life and death. Your life is yours for the keeping. No one can take that away. So, no one should live their life in accordance with what anyone other than God has to say. Yes, people should listen to and care about what other people have to say, but they shouldn’t let what others say dictate their lives. To “gain your own voice,” one must stop thinking what other people will say is so much better than what you want to say.

Overly confident people can be a pain to be around. It doesn’t matter if you are talking to them or not, you can hear them from a distance showing off their supposed ultimate superiority. Their bigheadedness is shed off on everyone in their vicinity and everyone can see the size of their egos makes up for any intelligence they may not have. They don’t allow opinions that go against what they believe to be true. They are so concerned with what they say and do is heeded they make sure only what they say is listened to. Because of that, people just stop caring about what the flamboyant kid says. Their words lose value and importance over time. If force comes into the equation, then respect for others is thrown out of the metaphorical window and a disrespectful person’s words are often not the most meaningful. Politely spoken words are taken into consideration more than the rash, rude ones.

Just doing a small act of kindness for someone, like letting him speak without talking over him, can make a person’s entire day, possibly even his week. People in this world can be so rude and just allowing a person to speak when he hasn’t been able to can be one of the only good things that’ll happen to him that week. It can show the person people do listen even though he may not be shouting at the top of his lungs. There can be times in one’s life when one just feels like she isn’t good enough or she just doesn’t matter at all. This isn’t true, as everyone knows. Every single person has worth and the ability to do something with what she says. Whether it is something good or something bad is up to the spokesperson. If someone decides to use her voice to shut people down in order to make herself rise up in her mind, her voice isn’t being used for what it was made for. Our voices were made to spread God’s word and love. If someone tells the group another has been trying to say something but has been talked over multiple times, that someone is using her voice to be helpful and kind to others.

It can be hard to take a step back from speaking everything you think. People want other people to care about them, which includes what they say. The listening ears of others do not determine a person’s worth and neither does another person. Your life isn’t determined by how many people listen to you or how many sentences have been taken into consideration by others There are more important things than being heard. Being kind to others and finding out who you are are more beneficial than having yourself be heard. Anyway, unless the talk is of God, all of the things that are talked about are of worldly things. There is so much more than just this world, this earth. Life after death with God is the ultimate goal, and having people listen to what you think of this topic is not going to get you there. Believing in God’s word and spreading it is more helpful in getting you to Heaven than making people listen to you. Using force is only beneficial in Star Wars. People will listen to you if you let them do it on their own, but making someone else quiet so you can throw your words out in the open doesn’t really make a person want to listen to you. It’s like cleaning: if someone is told to clean her room then it makes the task so much harder and unsatisfying than if that person decided to do it because she either wanted to or thought it was necessary. People make their own decisions and live their own lives. Not a single person needs to find validation from another person. A person’s voice matters whether it is heard or not.

Bibliography

Petit, Zachary. “72 of the Best Quotes About Writing.” Writer’s Digest, 22 June, 2012. www.writersdigest.com/editor-blogs/there-are-no-rules/72-of-the-best-quotes-about-writing. 23 Nov. 2016.

He is Real and He is Risen

Destiny Phillips Coats

Faith is an important part of everyday life whether one is an atheist, Buddhist, or Christian. All worldviews and religions are based on a premise or ideal. For that worldview or religion to hold true, humans want to see evidence; however, everything humans believe cannot be scientifically proven with evidence all the time. Nevertheless, we should always try to uncover the truths we can to be closer to the reason why we are here. As a Christian, this is extremely important. With the current vehement attack on religion by secularists around the world, Christians are constantly being questioned if their “Jesus” is real more and more often. It is vital believers of any religion can properly defend themselves against false truths and claims made against them by others. One aspect of Christianity all believers must defend is the case and point of Jesus Christ. The points brought up in the following paragraphs will prove the resolution of the Christian faith Jesus of Nazareth (called Christ) was executed by order of the Roman Governor (Pontius Pilate), was buried, then was resurrected and appeared in bodily form to His followers. There will be six points of proof confirming this resolution. The proofs are as follows: prove the authentication of the New Testament by including the date it was written and if the authors wrote from close experience about the events in which they wrote, prove Jesus was a real man who walked upon the earth, prove Jesus made the claim to be the promised Messiah, prove Jesus was crucified by Pontius Pilate for the crime of blasphemy brought on Him by the Jews, prove Jesus died by means of crucifixion, and prove Jesus resurrected. Not only believing these proofs but knowing it for oneself to be true can work wonders in his daily walk, the way he evangelizes, and again his personal relationship with Christ. For some, just to believe something is not enough. This essay presents reasoning and evidence why one should believe in the existence, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.

To affirm this resolution, I would like to first prove the authentication of the New Testament.  In doing this, one would need to know the date the New Testament was written and if the authors wrote from close experience about the events in which they wrote. Jesus’ birth marks A.D. 0 on history’s timeline, so all His actions on the Earth would have been done in the first century; therefore, the New Testament would be the most accurate if also written in the first century. Good thing for Christians, it was. Per the book New Evidence That Demands a Verdict, the New Testament was written in “A.D. 50-100” (McDowell 38). It reads

John Ryland’s manuscript, found in A.D. 130, is located in the John Ryland’s Library of Manchester, England (oldest extant fragment of the New Testament). Because of its early date and location (Egypt), some distance from the traditional place of composition (Asia Minor), this portion of the Gospel of John tends to confirm the traditional date of the composition of the Gospel about the end of the 1st century (38).

All manuscripts we have today of ancient writings or documents are copies of copies; therefore, trying to disprove the validity of the New Testament with the argument it is not the original text is disqualified (Hamilton). In comparison to most ancient writings, the New Testament is easily considered the best attested in terms of the number of copies and the variety of documents available to sustain or contradict it (McDowell, New Evidence 38). For example, Homer’s Iliad was composed in 800 B.C., but the earliest copy found was in 400 B.C. and there are only 643 copies. That is a 400-year gap! The New Testament was composed between the years A.D. 50-100 and fragments were found in A.D. 114. Books were found in A.D. 200, most of the New Testament was discovered in A.D. 250, and finally the complete New Testament was revealed in A.D. 325. On top of that glorious information, there are 5,366 copies (38)! Knowing this, there is no reason why someone cannot believe or at least consider the authenticity of the New Testament. Also, there is proof the authors of the New Testament wrote from close encounters with the main character, Jesus. “The writers of the New Testament wrote as eyewitnesses or from firsthand information” (51). An example of this is Luke 1:1-3:

Inasmuch as many have undertaken to set in order a narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you and orderly account, most excellent Theophilus (51).

McDowell quotes F. F. Bruce, who said,

The earliest preachers of the gospel knew the value of…first-hand testimony, and appealed to it time and time again. “We are witnesses of these things,” was their constant and confident assertion. And it can have been by no means so easy as some writers seem to think to invent words and deeds of Jesus in those early years, when so many of His disciples were about, who could remember what had and had not happened.

And it was not only eyewitnesses that the early preachers had to reckon with; there were others less well disposed who were also conversant with the main facts of the ministry and death of Jesus. The disciples could not afford to risk inaccuracies (not to speak of willful manipulation of the facts), which could at once be exposed by those who would be only too glad to do so. On the contrary, on the strong points in the original apostolic preaching is the confident appeal to the knowledge of the hearers; they not only said, “We are witnesses of these things,” but also, “As you yourselves also know” (Acts 2:22). Had there been any tendency to depart from the facts in any material respect, the possible presence of hostile witnesses in the audience would have served as a further corrective (51-52).

Next, I will uncover evidence for why one should accept the facts Jesus of Nazareth truly walked upon the Earth. This argument tends to be easy to prove because so many secular sources outside of the Bible reference the man who Christians call Christ (Hamilton). The excerpt known as the “Testimonium of Josephus,” which comes out of book 18 of Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities is enough to prove this point. Josephus was a Jewish scholar captured by the Romans during the first Jewish revolt against Rome. He was made mediator and interpreter for the Romans during the remainder of the revolt. Two of his writings are The Jewish War and Jewish Antiquities. A portion of the “Testimonium of Josephus” reads, “Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was the Christ…” (McDowell, New Evidence 125). Other writers such as Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius, and Thallus mention this man, Christ, in their writings. Tacitus, a Roman historian who lived from A.D. 55-120, wrote during the reign of Nero concerning Christ. “…the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time, broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also” (120-121). Tacitus’ misspelling of Christ, “Christus,” was a common error made by pagan writers of the time (120).

The claim was made by Jesus that He was the promised Messiah. Claiming to be the Son of God or Messiah was considered blasphemy in the Jewish religious system and punishable by death, hence why Jesus was ultimately crucified. Jesus often referred back to the Old Testament prophecies about Himself when hinting to his followers about who He was. Luke 24: 27 reads, “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.” Also, Luke 24:44 declares, “Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled’” (McDowell, Carpenter 97). McDowell says, “the Old Testament contains sixty major messianic prophecies and approximately 270 ramifications that were fulfilled in one person, Jesus Christ. It is helpful to look at all these predictions fulfilled in Christ as his ‘address.’ Let me explain. You have probably never realized the importance of your own name and address, yet these details set you apart from more than six billion other people who also inhabit this planet” (98). “Certainly God was writing an address in history that only his Messiah could fulfill. Approximately forty men have claimed to be the Jewish Messiah. But only one, Jesus Christ, appealed to fulfilled prophecy to substantiate his claims, and only his credentials back up those claims” (99).

Jesus was crucified by Pontius Pilate for the crime of blasphemy brought on Him by the Jews. The two main groups of Jewish leaders at the time were the Pharisees and Sadducees. On views concerning the Messiah, these two groups were not on the same page but came together when they had a common problem, Jesus Christ. They also had different purposes when it came to governing their Jews (Hamilton). The Pharisees believed the reason the Jews were under oppression by the Romans was because God would not send the promised Messiah until they were worthy enough.  In accomplishing their worthiness, the Pharisees used violent methods for the Jews to strive for purity amongst other people. Therefore, there was such hatred and strife between the Jews and Gentiles throughout history and the Bible. When Jesus came on the scene, He began to break down these barriers the Pharisees had set between the Jews and other people groups. Jesus ministered and dwelt amongst tax collectors, prostitutes, and criminals. In the eyes of the Pharisees, this was completely absurd and totally broke down all boundaries they had worked so hard to set between “God’s people” and others (Hamilton). The Sadducees, on the other hand, were more concerned with staying in good graces with their oppressors at the time, the Romans. The Romans did not care or were not concerned with who the Jews worshipped unless it conflicted with political rule. The promised Messiah did exactly that. The Messiah for the Jews was the one who the Jews believed was going to come and set them free from their oppressors. This in turn threatened the political rule of the Romans and threatened the well-being of the Jews under their rule. During Passover, Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey as the Jews surrounded him and called Him “Messiah,” “Hosanna,” the “Christ.” These names carried meaning far more than we credit them with today, which is why the authorities felt threatened. This caused the Pharisees and Sadducees to come together to take down a common enemy (Hamilton). Book 18 of Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities reads, “He was the Christ, and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and named from him are not extinct at this day” (Hamilton).

With Josephus being a Jew himself, when he writes “us,” he is referencing other Jews (Hamilton). Cornelius Tacitus, a Roman historian who lived from A.D. 55-120, wrote during the reign of Nero concerning Christ,

But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he falsely charged with the guilt, and punished with the most exquisite tortures, the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time, broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also .

McDowell, New Evidence 120-121

Also, inspired by another Roman Historian Suetonius, McDowell writes, “Assuming Jesus was crucified in the early thirties, Suetonius, no friend of Christianity, places Christians in the imperial city less than twenty years later, and he reports that they were suffering and dying for their conviction that Jesus Christ had really lived, died, and risen from the dead” (122).

Proving the death of Christ is not something debated upon because of the gruesome medical analysis of a Roman crucifixion. The crucifixion process consisted of a flogging or scourging and then the nailing to the cross. Flogging or scourging was done while one was stripped of clothes. The person would be beaten with a leather whip that had pieces of broken bones and iron balls on the end of the whip before being hung on the cross. The victim subjected to the cross would be flogged within inches of his life. The Jews would only allow forty strikes from the whip to the victim. This confirms the account from the Gospels Jesus obtained thirty-nine strikes during his flogging. At this point in the process, the victim could easily die from blood loss or shock from the pain. In the case of Jesus, He did not. After this, the victim had to carry his cross to the venue where he would be hung. Once he reached the chosen spot, he was nailed to the cross near the top of his wrists and feet. The most common cause of death was suffocation. This was because the body weight of the victim was being pulled down by gravity making it hard to breathe. To exhale, the victim would have to push up from his feet, which caused excruciating pain. Eventually, the victim would give up and die. If it took too long for the person to die, the Roman guard would break the knees of the victim so he would suffocate faster (Gidley). This was not done with Jesus because He was already dead after six hours of being on the cross.  But to confirm His death, they pierced Him in the side of His abdomen with a spear. The Babylonian Talmud reads,

It has been taught: On the eye of Passover they hanged Yeshu. And an announcer went out, in front of him, for forty days (saying): “He is going to be stoned, because he practiced sorcery and enticed and led Israel astray. Anyone who knows anything in his favor, let him come and plead in his behalf.” But, not having found anything in his favor, they hanged him on the eye of Passover (King).

Another version of this says, “Yeshu of Nazarene.” “Yeshu” is Greek for “Jesus” and “Nazarene” makes further connection to Jesus Christ. Also the “hanged” is a reference to crucifixion. Luke 23:39 reads, “One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, ‘Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!’” (McDowell, New Evidence 123-124).

The final part to prove of the resolution concerning Jesus’ resurrection is the most difficult to prove, but nonetheless, it has been done. First off, a whole religion took off from this man Jesus who claimed to be the Messiah. The thing that made Jesus significantly different from all the other claimed Messiahs was His resurrection. The other twelve “Messiah Movements” before and after Him dissipated after their deaths, but Jesus’ movement took off because of His incredible death and resurrection. To discredit the resurrection, one would have to come up with an explanation for why the tomb came up empty. The tomb was empty because Christianity would not have been validated if the body had been in the tomb for people to see the disciples were lying; therefore, this “Jesus” would have been just another fake. The Talmud proclaims the disciples stole the body, but that can be easily disproved. When people die for faith, this means they genuinely believe what they believe is absolute truth. For the disciples to steal the body knowing Jesus was not resurrected but all end up dying for his sake would be idiotic (Hamilton). The appearances are also confirmation of how we know Jesus was raised from the dead. Jesus appears to the disciples, James (his step brother), the apostle Paul, and 500 witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:3-7). People try to disprove the appearances by saying they made it up or they had hallucinations (Hamilton). First of all, hallucinations are sourced from previous events or thoughts. If none of these people ever thought or considered a resurrection or a picture of the way his new body looked, how then could they give such vivid accounts and descriptions of how he looked? Also there is no way so many people who were not associated with each other could have had the same hallucination. Then there is the whole theory they made it up. This can be disproved with the fact Paul, who saw Jesus, was actually an enemy of Christians previous to his so-called “hallucination.” He persecuted them on a regular basis. But after his encounter with Christ, he became one of the greatest people of the faith and wrote the majority of the New Testament (Hamilton). As stated above, in the “Testimonium of Josephus” Josephus wrote, “For he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him” (McDowell, New Evidence 125).

As a Christian, writing this essay has not only increased my faith in what I believe to be true but also has given me the ability to witness to nonbelievers with a better knowledge of what it is I am striving to convince them. The evidence provided above is clear and adequately affirms the resolution Jesus of Nazareth (called Christ) was executed by order of the Roman Governor (Pontius Pilate), was buried, then was resurrected and appeared in bodily form to His followers.

Believers with questions of any faith should always desire or seek out truth for what they believe. If one is to travel upon this journey and comes out on the other end less convinced, he must consider his faith. Thankfully in my case, I gained a deeper understanding and love for the great attention God put into helping people who desire to know Christianity is valid.


Works Cited

Gidley, Robert. The Facts of Crucifixion. The Cross Reading. n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.

Hamilton, Seraphim. Summit Christian Academy, Yorktown. 9, 11 Dec. 2013. Lecture.

King, Kevin. The Hanging of Yeshu. Rabbinic Literature. n.d. Web. 22 Jan. 2014.

McDowell, Josh. The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1999. Print.

—. More Than a Carpenter. Carol Stream: Tyndale House, 1977. Print.

Ecology 101

Tim Seaton

The world as we know it is declining in its beauty and increasing in the amount of pollution that harms it. We see more and more factories in place of the trees. We see more smoke than we do clouds in numerous places. We see the artificial lights of man instead of the stars of the heavens. We see roads and stores where nature used to reside. All of this is because men are taking nature and turning it into places for them to make money. We make the world worse for our gain. If we continue this, we may not have anything left to gain from.

There are lots of negative ways we are making the environment less healthy because of our advancements. Some of them are pollutants leading to acid rain, deforestation, landfills, the creation of nuclear energy that leads to radioactive waste disposal, pesticides, smog, and soil pollution. These are all pollutants men have enabled to happen with the technology we have. We could have none of these if we figured out a way to effectively use and create energy.

First off, there is acid rain. Acid rain is any form of precipitation with high levels of nitric and sulfuric acids. It can also occur in the form of snow, fog, and tiny bits of dry material that settle to Earth. Acid rain comes down and decreases or totally ruins the plant it falls on. We can stop this by decreasing the usage of the objects that create the acid rain. Andrew L. Lewis Jr. said, “Saying sulfates do not cause acid rain is the same as saying that smoking does not cause lung cancer.” He is stating things we do and create are causing us problems as definitely as smoking causes cancer, so we need to stop. We need to stop creating what is making the problems, because, until we do, there will be problems.

Next deforestation is a big problem. Deforestation is the destruction of forests in order to make the land available for other uses. An estimated 18 million acres (7.3 million hectares) of forest, which is roughly the size of the country of Panama, are lost each year. This could be a rain forest or any other type of forest or even just some trees. We can stop illegal deforestation by putting people to patrol areas where it is illegal or have some sort of security measure. We can stop legal deforestation by being content with what we have and not needing to be bigger and better than everyone else. Prince Charles of Wales said, “Forests are the world’s air-conditioning system — the lungs of the planet — and we are on the verge of switching it off.” He knows that as deforestation is happening, the air that flows in the world becomes thicker. Even though each tree makes very little difference, altogether, if every tree is dead, we will be dead. We need to take any efforts to stop deforestation from happening.

Pesticides are another way of pollution. We use pesticides to kill bugs or other harmful organisms. We use harmful substances to the bugs and other organisms, but they end up harming our plants also. When we are using the pesticides, we are basically killing off part of our economy. We use money on the crops and the pesticide and end up wasting them both. We need to stop using pesticides and find something else that will help kill the bugs off but keep the plants alive. Masanobu Fukuoka once said, “The final principle of natural farming is no pesticides. Nature is in perfect balance when left alone.” He is pointing out that before we added harmful things to the plants and nature, it was perfect, so why do we need to add them?

Nuclear Energy is another negative way we affect the environment. We are harming the universe. It is defined as the use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power plant. The term includes nuclear fission, nuclear decay, and nuclear fusion. We can stop nuclear energy by finding different ways to create lots of energy efficiently and easily. Mark Z. Jacobson has been quoted saying, “Every dollar spent on nuclear is one less dollar spent on clean renewable energy and one more dollar spent on making the world a comparatively dirtier and a more dangerous place, because nuclear power and nuclear weapons go hand in hand.” He is noting that when we spend a dollar on nuclear energy, we may as well be spending a dollar to make the world dirtier.

Radioactive waste disposal from nuclear energy is also a problem. It is burying what we humans cannot handle. Even when buried, it will slowly spread out, although after a long time the waste will be totally dissipated. In this time, there is the possibility it could seep into waterways or into the ground our animals eat from. It is also harming the ground it is in. That ground will not be able to be used for a long time after that, so we should not even consider this option. James Buchan said, “For 50 years, nuclear power stations have produced three products which only a lunatic could want: bomb-explosive plutonium, lethal radioactive waste and electricity so dear it has to be heavily subsidised. They leave to future generations the task, and most of the cost, of making safe sites that have been polluted halfway to eternity.” He is taking a stance on the fact that right now, we are not doing anything positive with nuclear energy and the waste it makes, so why use it at all.

Next are oil spills. They are made by man’s error in their creations. They are the release of a liquid petroleum hydrocarbon into the environment, especially marine areas, due to human activity and is a form of pollution. The term is usually applied to marine oil spills, where oil is released into the ocean or coastal waters, but spills may also occur on land. It often kills many animals in the water and makes that water unusable, but it also happens on land. It makes the land unusable like water, but it can release fumes that affect the area around it. It can kill wildlife and forests there. It also wastes the oil and the resources spent to obtain it. We can stop this problem by creating objects less flawed or by finding other effective means of getting the oil. Billy Nungesser said this about the BP oil spill in 2010: “They said the black oil wouldn’t come ashore. Well, it is ashore. It’s here to stay and it’s going to keep coming.” Even when we don’t think oil spills could hurt the environment much, we couldn’t be much farther from the truth. Almost every animal who comes in contact with it is hurt for life, if they don’t first die because of it. The land is rendered unusable for a long time after it happens.

Next is smog. Smog is defined as fog or haze combined with smoke and other atmospheric pollutants. Some of the ways we can stop smog are to stop creating smoke or other pollutants. We can have more eco-friendly cars such as electric or hybrid cars that use the sun for some of their “fuel.” We can create objects that will cut down on pollutants. Michael Connelly once said, “The setting sun burned the sky pink and orange in the same bright hues as surfers’ bathing suits. It was beautiful deception, Bosch thought, as he drove north on the Hollywood Freeway to home. Sunsets did that here. Made you forget it was the smog that made their colors so brilliant, that behind every pretty picture there could be an ugly story.” He is stating that even when something like sunsets look beautiful, there is often an ugly story behind it, in this case, the smog.

Another pollutant problem we have is soil pollution. This is when humans put things we are not supposed to into the dirt. Some examples of this are toxic chemicals, pesticides, lead, sewage, and metals. Others include acid, solvents, and herbicides. Leftover ash can get in the ground through coal production and disposal. Pesticides are also a type of soil pollution. When it is sprayed, the excess seeps into the ground and can stay there for longer than 40 years. When we are putting these in the ground, we are putting harmful substances there. We can stop this by just stopping the polluting we are doing. Wendell Berry said about soil pollution, “The soil is the great connector of lives, the source and destination of all. It is the healer and restorer and resurrector, by which disease passes into health, age into youth, death into life. Without proper care for it we can have no community, because without proper care for it we can have no life.” He is saying that with the soil being polluted, we will not have most of our lives and our needs cannot be fulfilled.

Landfills are places where lots of damage is being done. People think landfills are great ideas, but they have their flaws also. They are a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land. They are harmful, though, in some ways. When we put electronics in landfills, we are accidently putting in toxins such as arsenic, mercury, cadmium, PVC, solvents, and even some lead. All of these are harmful not just to the land but potentially to the humans working there as well. We can eliminate this risk if we find better ways to dispose of the waste, such as recycling our waste. We can use this possibly to create more energy or at least not have to release more pollutants creating more energy. “A landfill-based system presents substantial long-term risks of increased water and air pollution. Landfills are often viewed as nuisances in communities, they provide few jobs to the local economy, and may depress surrounding property values. Once a landfill closes, the land has limited use for future development. Thus, the social costs of shifting to a landfill based system are great, especially in communities.” This shows landfills aren’t that much of a help to the world right now. It lowers the value of everything around it and doesn’t allow for much to be done with it after it is closed.

We also have many good ways we help nature. Some of these are finding ways to create less pollutants, wildlife conservation, recycling, and landfills. They are all ideas that have shown how to create energy efficient ideas that don’t create pollution either. They can be made even better if worked on and spark ideas for even better inventions.

First off, there are many ways we can create less pollutants. One example is alternative fuel/hybrid cars. These are vehicles that run on a fuel other than traditional petroleum fuels. It also refers to any technology of powering an engine that does not involve solely petroleum. Some of these cars are the Toyota Prius, Ford Escape, and the Honda Civic. They all use gas at some times, but their main fuel is the battery that charges between drives. Most companies are starting to develop hybrids that run mostly on fuel. They are able to be used and not be polluting the universe any more than necessary. Companies are making more and more hybrids to save money, gas, and not pollute the earth as much.

Next there is wildlife conservation. This is protecting areas of importance for wildlife, flora, fauna, or features of geological or other special interest, which is reserved and managed for conservation and to provide special opportunities for study. We have been able to keep endangered species from becoming extinct. This has happened with the gray wolf, the brown pelican, the Aleutian Canadian goose, and many others. There are hundreds of wildlife conservations and national parks, which both provide safe havens for animals worldwide. We make more and more every year. Security around some conservations are extra protection for the animals, yet some poachers still get into them and kill animals. We need to try and have all animals in wildlife conservations or other safe havens or they might go extinct as well. With wildlife conservations, we can also protect the plants that are there. We need to protect them because they are a key part of our nature’s way of life also.

Recycling is another great way to protect nature. Recycling is converting waste into reusable material. We do this by first loading our recycling into trucks. We then put items into hoppers in which the material is funneled into different stations where workers sort it into what it is made of. Trash continues on the line and is sent to landfills, and recycling items are sent to be sorted more. They are then put into machines that smash glass bottles and put them in separate containers to be recycled. All the other material goes into a conveyor that drops off metal and plastic and lets cardboard and papers go. These are hand sorted and go into sorting bins that lead to a fiber baler to be recycled. Plastic bottles go into the container baler. Metal cans are put on a separate baler to be recycled. David Korten said,

To achieve true sustainability, we must reduce our “garbage index” — that which we permanently throw away into the environment that will not be naturally recycled for reuse — to near zero. Productive activities must be organized as closed systems. Minerals and other non-biodegradable resources, once taken from the ground, must become a part of society’s permanent capital stock and be recycled in perpetuity. Organic materials may be disposed into the natural ecosystems, but only in ways that assure that they are absorbed back into the natural production system.

He is pointing out the fact we need to be able to return what we have used so we do not run out of resources or make the earth a terrible place. If we do, then we will not have a society that runs or works like we have it intended to.

Finally, there are landfills. As stated earlier, landfills are a place to dispose of refuse and other waste material by burying it and covering it over with soil, especially as a method of filling in or extending usable land. Landfills have some good properties that come along with the bad ones. They are able to extend land that is somewhat useable. They let the government monitor the waste disposal. Maybe the most needed reason for landfills is it allows all the problems stray waste can leave to be concentrated in one area. People may ask, how is this good? It allows all the chemicals to be concentrated in one area, leaving all the other land to be good for things that need soil such as growing crops. It lets us gather waste so the country can know what is being used. We can learn much about people just from the trash and waste they produce.

In conclusion, we definitely need to find more ways to create energy efficiently yet eco-friendly because it is one of the biggest problem causers for pollution. We need to find better ways to kill the nuisances that don’t harm crops, the ground, or the farmers spraying it.  We need to find ways to make oil transportation that will not fail, and we need to find ways to make more safe ways of making energy and eco-friendliness. We need to make the world a better place. We need to take care of the world God gave to us. He wants us to care for it, not make it a place filled with pollution and war. Not a wasteland of hate and ugliness. We need to be better stewards of the land we have been given.

On Edgar Allan Poe

Emma Kenney

Edgar Allan Poe is one of the most well-known writers of the American Romanticism genre of all time. His poems and short stories incorporate many common Romanticism themes and concepts, such as the elevation of emotion over reasoning and nature over civilization. He used descriptive language and fantastical undertones to draw his readers in and earn him the title of one of America’s most famous poets.

Poe was born in Boston, Massachusetts to two professional actors on January 19, 1809. By the time he turned three, his birth parents had passed away and he was taken in by the Allans in Richmond, Virginia. He began writing at a young age but was shamed for it by his foster father, who wanted him to take over the family business. This helped create the rocky relationship between Poe and his foster father, one that would only worsen over the years. Poe received education at one of the best boarding schools in the country and later was accepted into the University of Virginia. Here he met a girl named Sarah Royster, and soon the two were engaged. However, the young man had to drop out of the college a year into his education after his gambling got him into financial trouble. This was the final straw, and Poe and his foster parents had a large falling out that ended with the Allans refusing to help Poe pay off his debt or let him come back home to stay with them until he could pay it off himself. Soon after, Poe discovered Sarah had been cheating on him, and he called off his engagement with her, depressed and broken-hearted.

The man joined the army after this, and it was this year (1827) that his first volume of poetry was published. He published a few more volumes of poetry within the next two years, though they weren’t exactly successful. After his failed first attempt at poetry, Edgar Allan Poe began attending the United States Military Academy at West Point. Though he was an excellent student, Poe once again had to drop out of school because he was financially unable to support himself, and he couldn’t seem to handle the strict military duties that came with the Academy. He once again fought with his foster father, who had remarried after his foster mother passed away. Once again, Poe was told he was not allowed to come home and he would not be receiving any help financially. After this he moved in with his aunt and younger cousin in Maryland, having nowhere else to go.

Then Poe began writing and publishing short stories. He also began writings and editing for various magazines including the Broadway Journal in New York City. He spent the next ten years of his life doing this, during which he married his cousin, who was about 14 at the time. During these ten years Poe published some of his most famous works, including “The Fall of the House of Usher” and “The Raven.” He struggled to get by for a while, but after one of his short stories won a writing competition, Poe became a sensation almost over night. Poe’s foster father passed away during this time, creating even more resentment on the part of Poe when he left him out of the will entirely but included an illegitimate child in it instead.

Poe was a vicious critic; his reviews of books and other writings would eventually create so much drama he would be asked to leave the magazine or change his review style. Poe chose to leave. Some sources say his struggle with alcoholism played into the magazine’s decision to ask him to leave, but so far it hasn’t been proven for sure either way.

A few years after this his wife grew ill and passed away. Poe struggled greatly dealing with this; he became extremely depressed, and his alcoholism reached a new peak. He once again began to struggle financially, as he focused mainly on fueling his desire for alcohol. Eventually his extreme alcohol intake caused him to experience extremely poor health, and it eventually caused him to die of “congestion of the brain” on October 7, 1849.

After his death, one of his literary rivals was granted the task of writing his obituary. This rival purposefully strove to make Poe seem as horrible as possible, calling him not only an alcoholic but also an abuser of women and a deranged psychopath as well. This succeeded in damaging Edgar Allan Poe’s reputation for quite some time after his death. This same man wrote the first ever biography of Edgar Allan Poe, ruining his reputation after death even more. Eventually, however, the general public began reading the works of Poe again, and he finally achieved the renown commonly associated with him today.

Poe is a spectacular example of American Romanticism, which, as previously stated, is defined by characteristics such as the elevation of emotion of reason and the elevation of nature over civilization. It also commonly uses writing techniques such as using what could be considered almost excessive descriptive language.

One of the prime examples of this is his “The Tell-Tale Heart.” This story is about a man who gets a new neighbor. After a short period of time, the man begins to become paranoid, hating one of his neighbor’s eyeballs. He even goes so far as to name it “The Evil Eyeball.” This eye begins to drive the narrator madder and madder. Finally he comes to the conclusion he needs to kill his neighbor after both the eye and the beating of his neighbor’s heart continue to haunt his every hour. The narrator smothers him to death and takes out his heart. He then decides to chop the neighbor up and hide him under the floorboards. However, he still heard the beating of the heart. It drives him madder and madder yet again, until finally he can no longer take it and confesses the crime he committed.

This is a prime example of American Romanticism because right off the bat it elevates emotion over reason. The narrator’s obsession with the eye and heart are by no means reasonable. The beating of the heart after death is certainly emotionally based, as it is illogical to believe it could truly happen in real life. The entire story is about emotion itself; it shows how the emotion of guilt can eat away at a person even if he gets away with something, until finally the guilty person can no longer take it. It shows emotion is a driving force behind human actions. The narrator murders a man simply because he finds his eye annoying, symbolizing that humans will do terrible things and justify them as being okay because it got rid of a situation that was bringing them discomfort.

Overall, Poe is a wonderful example of American Romanticism, and he will most likely be a beloved American poet and short story author for many years to come.