Destiny Phillips Coats
Faith is an important part of everyday life whether one is an atheist, Buddhist, or Christian. All worldviews and religions are based on a premise or ideal. For that worldview or religion to hold true, humans want to see evidence; however, everything humans believe cannot be scientifically proven with evidence all the time. Nevertheless, we should always try to uncover the truths we can to be closer to the reason why we are here. As a Christian, this is extremely important. With the current vehement attack on religion by secularists around the world, Christians are constantly being questioned if their “Jesus” is real more and more often. It is vital believers of any religion can properly defend themselves against false truths and claims made against them by others. One aspect of Christianity all believers must defend is the case and point of Jesus Christ. The points brought up in the following paragraphs will prove the resolution of the Christian faith Jesus of Nazareth (called Christ) was executed by order of the Roman Governor (Pontius Pilate), was buried, then was resurrected and appeared in bodily form to His followers. There will be six points of proof confirming this resolution. The proofs are as follows: prove the authentication of the New Testament by including the date it was written and if the authors wrote from close experience about the events in which they wrote, prove Jesus was a real man who walked upon the earth, prove Jesus made the claim to be the promised Messiah, prove Jesus was crucified by Pontius Pilate for the crime of blasphemy brought on Him by the Jews, prove Jesus died by means of crucifixion, and prove Jesus resurrected. Not only believing these proofs but knowing it for oneself to be true can work wonders in his daily walk, the way he evangelizes, and again his personal relationship with Christ. For some, just to believe something is not enough. This essay presents reasoning and evidence why one should believe in the existence, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.
To affirm this resolution, I would like to first prove the authentication of the New Testament. In doing this, one would need to know the date the New Testament was written and if the authors wrote from close experience about the events in which they wrote. Jesus’ birth marks A.D. 0 on history’s timeline, so all His actions on the Earth would have been done in the first century; therefore, the New Testament would be the most accurate if also written in the first century. Good thing for Christians, it was. Per the book New Evidence That Demands a Verdict, the New Testament was written in “A.D. 50-100” (McDowell 38). It reads
John Ryland’s manuscript, found in A.D. 130, is located in the John Ryland’s Library of Manchester, England (oldest extant fragment of the New Testament). Because of its early date and location (Egypt), some distance from the traditional place of composition (Asia Minor), this portion of the Gospel of John tends to confirm the traditional date of the composition of the Gospel about the end of the 1st century (38).
All manuscripts we have today of ancient writings or documents are copies of copies; therefore, trying to disprove the validity of the New Testament with the argument it is not the original text is disqualified (Hamilton). In comparison to most ancient writings, the New Testament is easily considered the best attested in terms of the number of copies and the variety of documents available to sustain or contradict it (McDowell, New Evidence 38). For example, Homer’s Iliad was composed in 800 B.C., but the earliest copy found was in 400 B.C. and there are only 643 copies. That is a 400-year gap! The New Testament was composed between the years A.D. 50-100 and fragments were found in A.D. 114. Books were found in A.D. 200, most of the New Testament was discovered in A.D. 250, and finally the complete New Testament was revealed in A.D. 325. On top of that glorious information, there are 5,366 copies (38)! Knowing this, there is no reason why someone cannot believe or at least consider the authenticity of the New Testament. Also, there is proof the authors of the New Testament wrote from close encounters with the main character, Jesus. “The writers of the New Testament wrote as eyewitnesses or from firsthand information” (51). An example of this is Luke 1:1-3:
Inasmuch as many have undertaken to set in order a narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you and orderly account, most excellent Theophilus (51).
McDowell quotes F. F. Bruce, who said,
The earliest preachers of the gospel knew the value of…first-hand testimony, and appealed to it time and time again. “We are witnesses of these things,” was their constant and confident assertion. And it can have been by no means so easy as some writers seem to think to invent words and deeds of Jesus in those early years, when so many of His disciples were about, who could remember what had and had not happened.
And it was not only eyewitnesses that the early preachers had to reckon with; there were others less well disposed who were also conversant with the main facts of the ministry and death of Jesus. The disciples could not afford to risk inaccuracies (not to speak of willful manipulation of the facts), which could at once be exposed by those who would be only too glad to do so. On the contrary, on the strong points in the original apostolic preaching is the confident appeal to the knowledge of the hearers; they not only said, “We are witnesses of these things,” but also, “As you yourselves also know” (Acts 2:22). Had there been any tendency to depart from the facts in any material respect, the possible presence of hostile witnesses in the audience would have served as a further corrective (51-52).
Next, I will uncover evidence for why one should accept the facts Jesus of Nazareth truly walked upon the Earth. This argument tends to be easy to prove because so many secular sources outside of the Bible reference the man who Christians call Christ (Hamilton). The excerpt known as the “Testimonium of Josephus,” which comes out of book 18 of Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities is enough to prove this point. Josephus was a Jewish scholar captured by the Romans during the first Jewish revolt against Rome. He was made mediator and interpreter for the Romans during the remainder of the revolt. Two of his writings are The Jewish War and Jewish Antiquities. A portion of the “Testimonium of Josephus” reads, “Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was the Christ…” (McDowell, New Evidence 125). Other writers such as Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius, and Thallus mention this man, Christ, in their writings. Tacitus, a Roman historian who lived from A.D. 55-120, wrote during the reign of Nero concerning Christ. “…the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time, broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also” (120-121). Tacitus’ misspelling of Christ, “Christus,” was a common error made by pagan writers of the time (120).
The claim was made by Jesus that He was the promised Messiah. Claiming to be the Son of God or Messiah was considered blasphemy in the Jewish religious system and punishable by death, hence why Jesus was ultimately crucified. Jesus often referred back to the Old Testament prophecies about Himself when hinting to his followers about who He was. Luke 24: 27 reads, “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.” Also, Luke 24:44 declares, “Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled’” (McDowell, Carpenter 97). McDowell says, “the Old Testament contains sixty major messianic prophecies and approximately 270 ramifications that were fulfilled in one person, Jesus Christ. It is helpful to look at all these predictions fulfilled in Christ as his ‘address.’ Let me explain. You have probably never realized the importance of your own name and address, yet these details set you apart from more than six billion other people who also inhabit this planet” (98). “Certainly God was writing an address in history that only his Messiah could fulfill. Approximately forty men have claimed to be the Jewish Messiah. But only one, Jesus Christ, appealed to fulfilled prophecy to substantiate his claims, and only his credentials back up those claims” (99).
Jesus was crucified by Pontius Pilate for the crime of blasphemy brought on Him by the Jews. The two main groups of Jewish leaders at the time were the Pharisees and Sadducees. On views concerning the Messiah, these two groups were not on the same page but came together when they had a common problem, Jesus Christ. They also had different purposes when it came to governing their Jews (Hamilton). The Pharisees believed the reason the Jews were under oppression by the Romans was because God would not send the promised Messiah until they were worthy enough. In accomplishing their worthiness, the Pharisees used violent methods for the Jews to strive for purity amongst other people. Therefore, there was such hatred and strife between the Jews and Gentiles throughout history and the Bible. When Jesus came on the scene, He began to break down these barriers the Pharisees had set between the Jews and other people groups. Jesus ministered and dwelt amongst tax collectors, prostitutes, and criminals. In the eyes of the Pharisees, this was completely absurd and totally broke down all boundaries they had worked so hard to set between “God’s people” and others (Hamilton). The Sadducees, on the other hand, were more concerned with staying in good graces with their oppressors at the time, the Romans. The Romans did not care or were not concerned with who the Jews worshipped unless it conflicted with political rule. The promised Messiah did exactly that. The Messiah for the Jews was the one who the Jews believed was going to come and set them free from their oppressors. This in turn threatened the political rule of the Romans and threatened the well-being of the Jews under their rule. During Passover, Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey as the Jews surrounded him and called Him “Messiah,” “Hosanna,” the “Christ.” These names carried meaning far more than we credit them with today, which is why the authorities felt threatened. This caused the Pharisees and Sadducees to come together to take down a common enemy (Hamilton). Book 18 of Josephus’ Jewish Antiquities reads, “He was the Christ, and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and named from him are not extinct at this day” (Hamilton).
With Josephus being a Jew himself, when he writes “us,” he is referencing other Jews (Hamilton). Cornelius Tacitus, a Roman historian who lived from A.D. 55-120, wrote during the reign of Nero concerning Christ,
But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he falsely charged with the guilt, and punished with the most exquisite tortures, the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time, broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also .
McDowell, New Evidence 120-121
Also, inspired by another Roman Historian Suetonius, McDowell writes, “Assuming Jesus was crucified in the early thirties, Suetonius, no friend of Christianity, places Christians in the imperial city less than twenty years later, and he reports that they were suffering and dying for their conviction that Jesus Christ had really lived, died, and risen from the dead” (122).
Proving the death of Christ is not something debated upon because of the gruesome medical analysis of a Roman crucifixion. The crucifixion process consisted of a flogging or scourging and then the nailing to the cross. Flogging or scourging was done while one was stripped of clothes. The person would be beaten with a leather whip that had pieces of broken bones and iron balls on the end of the whip before being hung on the cross. The victim subjected to the cross would be flogged within inches of his life. The Jews would only allow forty strikes from the whip to the victim. This confirms the account from the Gospels Jesus obtained thirty-nine strikes during his flogging. At this point in the process, the victim could easily die from blood loss or shock from the pain. In the case of Jesus, He did not. After this, the victim had to carry his cross to the venue where he would be hung. Once he reached the chosen spot, he was nailed to the cross near the top of his wrists and feet. The most common cause of death was suffocation. This was because the body weight of the victim was being pulled down by gravity making it hard to breathe. To exhale, the victim would have to push up from his feet, which caused excruciating pain. Eventually, the victim would give up and die. If it took too long for the person to die, the Roman guard would break the knees of the victim so he would suffocate faster (Gidley). This was not done with Jesus because He was already dead after six hours of being on the cross. But to confirm His death, they pierced Him in the side of His abdomen with a spear. The Babylonian Talmud reads,
It has been taught: On the eye of Passover they hanged Yeshu. And an announcer went out, in front of him, for forty days (saying): “He is going to be stoned, because he practiced sorcery and enticed and led Israel astray. Anyone who knows anything in his favor, let him come and plead in his behalf.” But, not having found anything in his favor, they hanged him on the eye of Passover (King).
Another version of this says, “Yeshu of Nazarene.” “Yeshu” is Greek for “Jesus” and “Nazarene” makes further connection to Jesus Christ. Also the “hanged” is a reference to crucifixion. Luke 23:39 reads, “One of the criminals who were hanged railed at him, saying, ‘Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!’” (McDowell, New Evidence 123-124).
The final part to prove of the resolution concerning Jesus’ resurrection is the most difficult to prove, but nonetheless, it has been done. First off, a whole religion took off from this man Jesus who claimed to be the Messiah. The thing that made Jesus significantly different from all the other claimed Messiahs was His resurrection. The other twelve “Messiah Movements” before and after Him dissipated after their deaths, but Jesus’ movement took off because of His incredible death and resurrection. To discredit the resurrection, one would have to come up with an explanation for why the tomb came up empty. The tomb was empty because Christianity would not have been validated if the body had been in the tomb for people to see the disciples were lying; therefore, this “Jesus” would have been just another fake. The Talmud proclaims the disciples stole the body, but that can be easily disproved. When people die for faith, this means they genuinely believe what they believe is absolute truth. For the disciples to steal the body knowing Jesus was not resurrected but all end up dying for his sake would be idiotic (Hamilton). The appearances are also confirmation of how we know Jesus was raised from the dead. Jesus appears to the disciples, James (his step brother), the apostle Paul, and 500 witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:3-7). People try to disprove the appearances by saying they made it up or they had hallucinations (Hamilton). First of all, hallucinations are sourced from previous events or thoughts. If none of these people ever thought or considered a resurrection or a picture of the way his new body looked, how then could they give such vivid accounts and descriptions of how he looked? Also there is no way so many people who were not associated with each other could have had the same hallucination. Then there is the whole theory they made it up. This can be disproved with the fact Paul, who saw Jesus, was actually an enemy of Christians previous to his so-called “hallucination.” He persecuted them on a regular basis. But after his encounter with Christ, he became one of the greatest people of the faith and wrote the majority of the New Testament (Hamilton). As stated above, in the “Testimonium of Josephus” Josephus wrote, “For he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him” (McDowell, New Evidence 125).
As a Christian, writing this essay has not only increased my faith in what I believe to be true but also has given me the ability to witness to nonbelievers with a better knowledge of what it is I am striving to convince them. The evidence provided above is clear and adequately affirms the resolution Jesus of Nazareth (called Christ) was executed by order of the Roman Governor (Pontius Pilate), was buried, then was resurrected and appeared in bodily form to His followers.
Believers with questions of any faith should always desire or seek out truth for what they believe. If one is to travel upon this journey and comes out on the other end less convinced, he must consider his faith. Thankfully in my case, I gained a deeper understanding and love for the great attention God put into helping people who desire to know Christianity is valid.
Works Cited
Gidley, Robert. The Facts of Crucifixion. The Cross Reading. n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
Hamilton, Seraphim. Summit Christian Academy, Yorktown. 9, 11 Dec. 2013. Lecture.
King, Kevin. The Hanging of Yeshu. Rabbinic Literature. n.d. Web. 22 Jan. 2014.
McDowell, Josh. The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1999. Print.
—. More Than a Carpenter. Carol Stream: Tyndale House, 1977. Print.